User talk:Ajsoal5

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump (song). Shellwood (talk) 04:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajsoal5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm a new user to Wikipedia and I'm not really familiar with Wikipedia's rules and guidelines. I don't understand why I have been blocked for "Not here to build an encyclopedia", I have read this article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Here_to_build_an_encyclopedia#Clearly_not_being_here_to_build_an_encyclopedia and I don't think that I have violated any of the rules or guidelines. Could someone please explain what I have done wrongly in regards to my block. Thank you.
Also if the reason for my account block is sockpuppetry, someone has labeled my account as an sockpuppet of Kingshowman. Respectfully, this account is not in anyway related to Kingshowman. Can someone remove that notice. Ajsoal5 (talk) 03:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This edit was completely unconstructive as was your vulgar edit here. If those are the sorts of contributions we can expect from you, you will have to remain blocked as they contribute nothing to the building of this encyclopedia. If you have constructive contributions you wish to make, please describe what they are and perhaps provide an example as well. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would suggest any reviewing admin review the contributions of User:Ajsoal2 and the article history of Donald Trump (song) for more context. I can't make any comment on the connection to User:Kingshowman. Waggie (talk) 04:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These edits your trying to show me were made from the account User:Ajsoal2. That is a completely different and unrealted account to User:Ajsoal5 , although the names might look the same.User:Ajsoal2 is not in my possession anymore and I no longer have permission to access that account, that's why I created a new one . Ajsoal5 (talk) 11:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another Block Appeal

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ajsoal5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ajay Dragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

: I'm very sorry if I've broken any rules of Wikipedia, I'm a new user and I'm not familiar around here. The account User:Ajsoal2 is not in my possession anymore and I don't have access to it. That's why I created a new account. I reverted the edits that were made on the other account here. I'm sorry for my actions and if I was to be unblocked, I will obey Wikipedia's Rules and Guidelines and learn that Wikipedia will not tolerate any Vandalism. Please excuse my block and I will learn a lot from this. Thank You.

Donald Trump (Song) and Donald Trump (President)

Also can I make it clear that this account is not in anyway related to Kingshowman. It is not a sockpuppet. Can someone please remove that notice. I'm not sure that I can edit my User Page. Ajsoal5 (talk) 12:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No thanks. Nowhere near enough of an explanation. For example, you don't bother to fully address your IP socking or the strong suspicion you are the blocked vandal, Kingshowman. Yamla (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last Block Appeal

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ajsoal5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ajay Dragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I don't want to waste any administrators' time, so this is going to be my last Block Appeal that I'm going to make. If I don't succeed then I will leave Wikipedia and cease my dream of being a Wikipedian.

My last block appeal was declined because "you didn't bother to address the strong suspicion that your a sockpuppet of Kingshowman." This comment made by User:Yamla is untrue because I have addressed this specify in my last, and all of past block appeals. So If this is the reason that I have been blocked then I'm honestly not a sockpuppet and I would never do these things because I know this will get my editing rights taken away from me.

User:Yamla Please read this article here for more information.

Once again, I apologize if I have broken any Wikipedia rules and guidelines. If I was to be unblocked, I will take note and caution in every edit that I make so that I don't breach the Rules and Guidelines of Wikipedia again. Whoever is reviewing, can you please also read my last appeal because I believe that User:Yamla didn't care to read anything. Please give me another chance, I really want to be apart of the Wikipedia Community. Thank You. Ajsoal5 (talk) 08:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are User:Ajsoal2 and you also have recently decided to vandalize as an IP and troll our IRC network. We don't want people who are here to do this, especially when they involved personal attacks. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By address the strong suspicion that your a sockpuppet of kingshowman we mean explain why the suspicion is incorrect not just deny there is no connection as nearly all sockpuppeters deny it. Tknifton (talk) 14:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But if there genuinely isn't a connection, why should an editor be able to explain someone else's suspicion? (It's not only sockpuppeters who deny it, innocent people do too.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]