User talk:Ajs41

Greetings...

Hello, Ajs41, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too!) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Fischer.sebastian (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read the policy on Sources and Verifiability, and note that a radio show isn't necessarily a reliable source under the definition of that guideline. The next time you edit a page, please fill in the field Edit summary and give the source of the information you are adding, so that other editors can verify its legitimacy. Happy editing! Fischer.sebastian (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Qqqqqq (talk) 02:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Popular vote numbers

Hi. I see you have been recently updating the popular vote numbers on United States presidential election, 2008. Would you mind telling me where you are getting these popular vote numbers? I ask because the source listed on the article for the numbers shows different numbers than the ones you are providing, and I have to keep reverting your edits because your numbers are not backed up by a reliable source. Tim meh ! 02:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ajs41! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Bridgid Nzekwu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bridgid Nzekwu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridgid Nzekwu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgid Nzekwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wasserman's numbers vs Wikipedia's numbers

I compared Wasserman's numbers to Wikipedia's and found that the biggest discrepancies (not counting states where Wikipedia was more to date) are, in order of total vote difference: Mississippi (63,319), Ohio (22,827), Texas (20,649), Oregon (15,691), and Nebraska (14,552). All of these are states for which Wasserman has county-by-county data. Fourfourfive (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've just noticed the same thing. I started work on a Mississippi spreadsheet but I'm having trouble finding some of the county websites, so I'm going to start on Ohio now and leave MS for the moment. Ajs41 (talk) 03:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misssissippi county-by-county election totals

All of Mississippi's county totals are accessible from http://www.sos.ms.gov/elections_results_2012_county.aspx. Fourfourfive (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it has all of the county totals except Hinds, because Hinds county election results are not finalized yet. Fourfourfive (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wasserman has the final Obama/Romney numbers for every county except Hinds so he's using the AP/Politico data there. Fourfourfive (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm creating a spreadsheet with these results so you don't have to. Fourfourfive (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the spreadsheet [1]. Yazoo county results weren't listed on the MS site so I used politico data for that too. I also found an error in Wasserman's data: Sharkey county recorded 1782 votes for Obama, not 2782. Fourfourfive (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found the Yazoo county election results although they aren't listed [2]. Fourfourfive (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on those spreadsheets, I wasn't looking forward to having to do any more spreadsheets, much as I enjoyed doing the ones I've already done. Ajs41 (talk)

Your spreadsheet results

Your source for Tooele County, Utah is a bit out of date. There are slightly more up to date results here. The total difference is only 637 votes, but you may want to update. Fourfourfive (talk) 06:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wasserman may be using your spreadsheet results

I know that shortly after I added my New York results by county spreadsheet to Wikipedia, Dave Wasserman copied my results to use in his vote tracker so it's likely that he has used some of your spreadsheets as well. Obviously, everything we add to Wikipedia is free to be used by anyone, but I just thought you would like to know that he's using the data we've collected. Fourfourfive (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I updated a few counties for your Ohio spreadsheet

I made a copy of your spreadsheet and updated the results in four counties here. The counties that I updated are in red text. Fourfourfive (talk) 04:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holland-on-Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ajs41. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ajs41. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ajs41. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ajs41. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]