User talk:Ajay2211
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Ajay2211, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Winged Blades Godric 11:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
June 2019
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Laxmikant–Pyarelal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Laxmikant–Pyarelal was changed by Ajay2211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-06-11T10:00:57+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1][2] you add inappropriate links to laxmikantpyarelal.com. Wikipedia is not a forum for promotion and we don't indiscriminately add URLs to articles. Further, if you have a close connection to Laxmikant–Pyarelal, you are strongly discouraged from editing that article or related articles directly. This would be considered a conflict of interest, which is a serious ethical concern. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Recent edits to Laxmikant–Pyarelal
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edits may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.