User talk:Airplaneman/Archive 36
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Airplaneman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |
I'm Back!
Just thought I'd let you know I've unretired... again. Not to be the Brett Favre of Wikipedia. :)). Cheers,
Belugaboycup of tea? 22:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring again...
- TeeTylerToe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Sikorsky S-76 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Almost immediate resumption of edit warring on the aforementioned article page after expiry of his/her last block, refuses to take no for an answer when the general consensus amongst the regular editors is against accepting her/his warped version of the article, see the talk page for more evidence. Plus, making personal attacks on the talk page of several editor, including this and this on User talk:BilCat. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 20:11, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
ARTICLE ON MAURICE LAMM THAT YOU DELETED
Dear Airplaneman
I am contacting you because you deleted the page on Maurice Lamm because the article allegedly did not make the case that Maurice Lamm was important. This surprises me, as he is the author of the classic text "The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning", which is considered to be the definitive work on this subject. I have been reading this book, and decided to turn to Wikipedia to learn more about this man's biography. He has also authored other important books including "The Jewish Way in Love and Marriage", "Becoming a Jew", and "Living Torah in America" and "The Power of Hope".
If you believe he is insufficiently important to merit a wikipedia page, there are hundreds or perhaps thousands of Jewish studies scholars who would disagree with you. I have no personal relationship with Maurice Lamm, and no conflicts of interest.
I request that you please restore this page.
Sincerely
Ronald J. Sigal, MD, MPH, FRCPC Professor of Medicine, University of Calgary Health Senior Scholar, Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
Ron Sigal (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Sept. 7, 2012
Dear Airplaneman
I am still hoping you will respond to my note above, which I left on August 17, 2012.
Regards
Ron Sigal
Ron Sigal (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I've restored the page to User:Ron Sigal/Maurice Lamm, where you can work on it without fear of meanies like me removing the page from the view of the interwebs. The most important thing that needs to be done would be to find some reliable references. This page teaches you how. If you have questions, ask away. Happy editing, Airplaneman ✈ 01:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Article word usage
I actually figured you would know more about this, since you are an administrator. Here at Elizabeth II we are facing a sort of edit war on how certain lines of Elizabeth's biography should be written. Originally, the article read, "Elizabeth's only sibling, Princess Margaret, was born in 1930." BUT I changed it to, "Elizabeth had a sister, Princess Margaret, who was four years younger." Another editor stated that the former was necessary because readers would need clarification she had no other siblings. See User_talk:DrKiernan#Queen_Elizabeth.27s_sister. Spelling Style (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Ambassador Inquiry
Hello Airplaneman. I'm the instructor for a section of students at Ball State University who are beginning a collaborative research project on Wikipedia for our Introduction to Digital Literacies class. I've been teaching with WP since Spring 201; from my user page you can see a few example projects highlighted. We are currently in need of an online ambassador to advise five class groups on selecting topics and putting articles together: this means there will be five topics for an ambassador to assist with. Might you be interested in helping us? You can see the project timeline in my user area.
I have gone through the appropriate channels and application documents with the Wikimedia folks in charge of education programs, but have not heard back in nearly two weeks (I've emailed Jamie Mathewson twice). But time is getting short and we must begin—thus I'm taking the liberty of contacting potential ambassadors directly. Thanks for your consideration and good luck with your projects! Webster Newbold (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hello! Thanks for your editing on Wikipedia. - by Kevin12cd... Tell me how I'm doing on my Talkpage! 01:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
- And thanks for the cookie :). Airplaneman ✈ 01:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
teehee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Venomxx (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC) the boss i do not know you but you look like a boss
Season's tidings!
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Holiday cheer
Holiday Cheer | ||
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be a newbie, a good friend, someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
Happy Holidays
Warm wishes for a wonderful season and a happy new year!
Mono 04:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, man. It's good to see you around! Airplaneman ✈ 05:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Warriors role call
Brambleclawx 01:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
2015 Formula One
I'll comment tomorrow, I'm going to bed shortly. In the meantime could you possibly close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zest Airways Flight 865 as a snow?...William 03:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sure; that's been done. Good night! Airplaneman ✈ 03:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Somebody created 2015 Formula One again today. It was deleted but I'm betting it will be back again before spring....William 03:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- It has been create-protected for a year by User:RHaworth. Airplaneman ✈ 13:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Somebody created 2015 Formula One again today. It was deleted but I'm betting it will be back again before spring....William 03:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Moxie Marlinspike & Planogram
Thanks for the help. Much appreciated! --Ronz (talk) 02:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- It was my pleasure. Take care, Airplaneman ✈ 02:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the semi-protection
You semi-protected Chisti Order. Thank you! I hope that one week will be enough to discourage the persistent anon. Zora (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, hopefully it helps! Cheers, Airplaneman ✈ 06:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I saw that you Semi-Protected the article. Would you consider changing to PC-1? Many of the involved editors on that article and others are autoconfirmed, so while semi may slow down the campaign, it seems PC would be more likely to protect the project. The same issue exists at List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters and List of LGBT characters in television. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Will respond on your talk page. Airplaneman ✈ 13:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassadors update
Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.
You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.
Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.
If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.
- Please do these steps as soon as possible
First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.
Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:
Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).
After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)
As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.
- Communication and keeping up to date
In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:
- The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
- The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
- If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.
- Ambassador training and resources
We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)
Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.
The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.
Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!
--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Kurita Water Industries Edits
I will admit that my edits were a bit on the fresh side, but I think it would serve the public good to mention Issei Sagawa on the page, perhaps under a category called "Controversy." But before I write something up, I want to know I won't be permanently banned from Wikipedia for doing so. What I wrote was not factually incorrect. It was factually inconvenient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BJ2727 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 January 2013
- Sorry, I'm a bit lost... I'd be happy to help though. I'm quite busy nowadays, so I may not respond promptly, but if you have questions, just ask away. Airplaneman ✈ 21:39, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for clearing out some of the backlog at WP:RFPP, only a few more to go! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Callanecc; I appreciate it! The faster the requests are taken care of, the more effective protection is :). Airplaneman ✈ 01:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
I saw your name under almost all RfPP requests. I just have to say good job with your work with the mop! -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Luke! Airplaneman ✈ 17:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
Hello Sir, User: Niemti, continues to omit a key fact of WWII, the Nazi Government forcefully occupied Nations, and set up "Puppet Governments" in those countries to do their bidding. These Nations did not commit those atrocities of their own free will, they were forced to do so. I simply added some wording under "Belligerents" to clarify a known fact. Without my wording added the historical accuracy just isn't there. Please be open-minded to the factual truth, and stop Niemti from bastardizing history to their own liking. Many of us would like history to have been one way or another, but the fact remains, what was, is, and cannot be undone.
Sincerely, Rick V. Macys "Unique2tell" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unique2tell (talk • contribs) 19:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hey, Airplaneman. "Rick V. Macys", so dedicated to defaming the second only to the Jews...the largest group of victims of Nazi racial policy (as quoted from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum) while whitewashing the actual Lithuanian volunteers (because they were recruited not from the prisoners starving to death by their millions, but from free men who came on their own will - and this what they did: together with Lithuanian auxiliaries, began murdering the Jews of Lithuania...murdered about 90 percent of Lithuanian Jews, one of the highest victim rates in Europe), seriously needs a block - because protection didn't work, and that's literally all he does. --Niemti (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Mr. Macys, I'm not impressed with disputes like this one. It's like little children bickering. There are, of course, multiple way to interpret history. The word even has "story" in it! To this end, I give no credence to arguments that simply claim that information is untrue without the necessary reliable sources provided. With that being said, I realize the history of Europe over the course of the twentieth century is a contentious topic. It therefore must be approached not with fervor, but with caution. Right now, caution is not being taken. Here's a link to the AN/I thread for convenience: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_Warsaw_Ghetto_Uprising_vandalism_from_a_single-purpose_account. Airplaneman ✈ 21:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Your editnotice
The revisionuser magic word only works once an edit has been committed or previewed. The one in your editnotice is blank by default because there is no revisionuser - thought I'd let you know so that you can remove it. I mean, you don't have to, but it's a bit funny - all it says is "Hi, ".
Cheers, m.o.p 03:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks for catching that! Is there a way around that? Airplaneman ✈ 03:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not to my knowledge, sadly. I don't think the MediaWiki software has any way of telling who's looking at a page and printing their ID. m.o.p 03:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. It's ok; my message will just be a little less personal, haha Airplaneman ✈ 23:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not to my knowledge, sadly. I don't think the MediaWiki software has any way of telling who's looking at a page and printing their ID. m.o.p 03:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Panama's Cities
May I know why was the Panama largest cities page is protected? It's data IS wrong! Cocoliras (talk) 03:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- You are clearly engaged in a content dispute, as per the revision history of the page. I really am not the one to judge if the data is "wrong" or not; rather, it is up to you and your adversary to find a solution. Airplaneman ✈ 03:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protection request of Liana Alexandra
Thank You, Airplaneman! I believe that Biruitorul and his actions are in connection with this.Faithfully Yours,--Phorion (talk) 05:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- This individual has just accused me of being a Romanian spy on your talk page, on my talk page and on an article talk page. Could you please ask him to knock it off? - Biruitorul Talk 06:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: your protection of Sydney Airport
Hi Airplaneman, thanks for protecting Sydney Airport [1]. My concern is that the protection time is inadequate given the long-term nature of the abuse: the article has been the target of unconstructive anonymous edits for over 5 years. Surely if the article does not merit indefinite protection, 1 or 2 years would be the compromise option? I mean no disrespect, but I feel that 3 months is inadequate. Perhaps a third-opinion on the matter would be better? James (T • C) • 8:54pm • 09:54, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello James,
- Don't worry about hurting my feelings; that's quite hard to do, actually :). It's really easy to modify the lengths of protections, and I am therefore not extremely concerned about the exact length of the more long-term protections I do (say, 1 month and above) because it becomes a little harder to estimate from the article's history when the vandalism will stop, if ever. Seeing as Sydney Airport had never been protected before, I thought it would be a bit excessive to indefinitely protect it on the first go. You are definitely welcome to seek a third opinion on the matter, but frankly, all that needs to be done at the end of three months' time is to see how much disruption the article receives (can you call it vandalism? I would just call it poor editing) and re-protect it for a greater length of time the next time, if necessary. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 14:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delayed response. That seems reasonable to me, however, it escaped me as to why protection hadn't been sort before, given the article is fairly visible. I requested longer-term protection because there were a few repeat offenders and incidents where one user, anonymous or otherwise, made successive edits. This is particularly evident in the "recent" edits. Given past precedence, users who make erroneous edits in good faith won't give up and the vandals definitely won't. The period where an article comes off of protection is almost certainly followed by more ruckus. But I won't push the matter. James (T • C) • 3:32pm • 04:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Torreslfchero (talk) 18:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Chris Martin
Hi, TW bug did it again at Chris Martin. Could you restore its move-protection (sysop/Move=Block all non-admin users). Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for noticing, Tbhotch! I've fixed it. Airplaneman ✈ 06:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
writing a good wiki page
hey there,
im trying to write a wiki page about a club i used to be a part of in college. can you point me in the right direction or help me write a page that doesn't get deleted...
thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.251.68 (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, I assume you're referring to Vietnamese Student Association University of Maryland, College Park, which I deleted as per this criterion for deletion (failed notability). Unfortunately, I'm not sure the subject at hand meets the notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia at this current time. Sorry about that, Airplaneman ✈ 14:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi
Could you take a look at my request for page protection on Oba Chandler. It is quite urgent. It is an GA article. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Requests for page protection could use a few more hands. I'm going up the list; I'll get to it soon. I'm pretty sure most requests on RFPP are urgent; why else would they be on that page? Oh, and "GA article" is redundant (GA means good article, so no need to say article after that). Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 14:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- OK thank you for taking the time to respond. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I don't think this would be considered a WP:CANVAS violation, as there is no formal RfC going on, but I would appreciate it if you would look at and comment on my comment at the article above's talk page regarding possible BLP (BDP) issues. Thanks. Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't get to this sooner. It looks like you've come to some sort of conclusion. Airplaneman ✈ 18:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
Your help at Yin Yoga is much appreciated. EMP (talk 18:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Hopefully it works out. Airplaneman ✈ 18:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Protection off
Hello Airplaneman! You have protected List of South Korean idol groups recently on my request. I am done with the restructuring, and because the article became too huge in size due to the improved refs (around 500 refs), I was advised to split the article by decades. Because of this, protection is no longer required for the article. Could you please turn it off? Thanks a lot! 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 14:24, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Airplaneman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |