User talk:Aidan Work

Welcome!

Hello, Aidan Work, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Canadian titles debate, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stifle (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian titles debate

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canadian titles debate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for nearly 3 years, fails verifiability policy

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Aidan Work! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gerhard Rissik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Theunis Willem de Jongh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christian Lodewyk Stals - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Anguilla

The article Postal Orders of Anguilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to. Most content is actually off topic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Newfoundland

The article Postal Orders of Newfoundland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to. Article says they did not issue postal orders!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Basutoland

The article Postal Orders of Basutoland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one small item of information. Not notable. Not developed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Malta

The article Postal Orders of Malta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no real content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monarchy of Fiji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monarchy of Fiji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monarchy of Fiji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrKay (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]