User talk:Ai 00

use article talk pages instead

Revert restrictions at Gaza flotilla clash

As a word of caution, Gaza flotilla clash under a one-revert-per-day restriction. Reverting again to re-add the name "armada of hate" will likely earn you a block. Please continue to discuss the matter on the talk page. -- tariqabjotu 11:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page International reactions to the Gaza flotilla raid has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Mithrandir^Again (Talk!) 07:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Gaza flotilla clash

Hi, could you please see Talk:Gaza_flotilla_raid#Norwegian_military_expert --ReneJohnsen (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gaza flotilla raid. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please also note that there is an ArbCom decision which places a 1-revert rule on this article. Thank you. ReneJohnsen (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Blumenthal link

Here is the Blumenthal link. Still works for me clicking from the Talk:Gaza flotilla raid page. If you are having any problem accessing it from your location, I can email you the contents if you enable Wikipedia email.John Z (talk) 06:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Revert without explanation

Could you please explain this[[1]] revert of yours? Walky-talky (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Gaza flotilla raid, you may be blocked from editing. http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Gaza_flotilla_raid&action=historysubmit&diff=366293788&oldid=366293344 -- please stop mass deleting of RS material on the basis that they are not RS Epeefleche (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Gaza flotilla raid. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Wintonian (talk) 02:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

The Gaza flotilla article is a controversial subject and therefore any edits made need to have an edit summery to explain why the edit was made, in the case of substantial changes these need to be discussed first on the talk page. Additionally edits must be of a natural point of view see: WP:NPV.--Wintonian (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked 12 hours

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing for violating a clearly posted one-revert restriction on Gaza flotilla raid. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. NW (Talk) 03:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

I was about to add this: { {cot}}

Events during the preliminary stages

Route of the flotilla

The incoming fleet was known to Israel government, military and intelligence. Weeks before May 31 2001- the Israel Navy and General Staff held dozens of advance meetings over and the IDF led preparation for all aspects of the operation. The main military drafters were Israel Navy commander Admiral Eliezer Marom , Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and his deputy, Major General Benny Gantz. The Israel Navy provided solutions to expected and unexpected circumstances. Benjamin Netanyahu and Edmunt Barrak were complacent that the raid would not raise to big world reactions Maariv an Israeli press reported before the raid on May 28 some general aims of operation.

{ {cob}}

Just a second before the yellow things pop up. Ai 00 (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Would you like me to post that on the talk page of the article to see what others think of the addition? NW (Talk) 03:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, i do not cary about User:Ai 00 copyright :) . Or you can add it to the article. also i was editing new section in:

Looks like it could be a useful addition to the article. Just remember that with subjects like this it's always best to propose edits on the talk page first (apart from spelling etc.) and to always bear WP:NPV in mind and you'll be fine :-). --Wintonian (talk) 03:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Fate of participants

Yalcin Buyuk said that 48 others suffered gunshot wounds. He, Ismail Patel and Sarah Colman have also claimed that six activists are not accounted for, suggesting that the number of casualties may rise.

June 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Gaza flotilla raid, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not remove material supported by RSs, as you did here http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Gaza_flotilla_raid&diff=prev&oldid=367146160 Epeefleche (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Missing persons

Six passangers are not accounted for.<ref name="20100605Guardian">

So if you or someone else like it you can ivestigate it or agg it. ~~~~