User talk:Ahurvitz2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Grossman (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winner 42 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberta Grossman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ahurvitz2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Grossman (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Still lacking inline citations in places. Needs cleanup for typos and grammar. External links at the bottom seem to just be random and unorganized.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberta Grossman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ahurvitz2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Grossman (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aerospeed was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberta Grossman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aerospeed (Talk) 17:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ahurvitz2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aerospeed (Talk) 17:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ahurvitz2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 19:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ahurvitz2. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Roberta Grossman, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.
At WP:AFC you said "I have been asked again by Ms. Grossman to include ..." which suggests a close connection. 220 of ^Borg 19:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Roberta Grossman

Ahurvitz2, you have now removed all the references from the article. I said you need to remove the embedded external links not the references that are between <ref></ref> tags. This here [1] is what I meant220 of ^Borg 20:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You said to remove "embedding' external links in the text."

And then you instructed me to "move the sources out of the references section, and place them into the text after the fact/s to which they apply."

I removed the external links from the text.

But I didn't put the sources back into the text because they are external links.

Does that make sense to you? It makes no sense to me at all.

I'm sorry....I see you have made the corrections which I could not understand how to do.

wp:Indentation added to above message. 220 of ^Borg 20:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have restored the refs, and removed the ones in the reference section that were unnecessary here. I think I have maintained all your intermediate edits. References and external links are two different things! Originally I didn't notice that you had duplicates of the references, both in the text and within the references section.

It is now 6:30 AM here and I am going to bed hours late! :-/ 220 of ^Borg

Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it. And hope it will work.--Ahurvitz2 (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[user:220 of Borg|220]] of ^{Borg
May I ask if you think my article is ready to be re-submitted?Ahurvitz2 (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)--Ahurvitz2 (talk) 14:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

August 2015

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 20:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Grossman (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roberta Grossman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Roberta Grossman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberta Grossman. Thanks! Wxidea (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Wxidea

Wxidea (talk) I took your comments to heart and did some surgery on my draft to shorten it. --Ahurvitz2 (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Roberta Grossman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberta Grossman. Thanks! Wxidea (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wxidea: Thank you again for your continuing help

I'm very appreciative of your suggestions and guidance in writing https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Roberta_Grossman

You left me a comment: "Add a block which is like a filmography. See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Paul_Thomas_Anderson (you can be simpler than that, and can skip the reviews if it's not appropriate for documentaries, but the idea is to have a table/grid/matrix."

Which I am adding right now. Along with new categories as you suggested.

Thank you. Ahurvitz2 (talk) 17:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Grossman has been accepted

Roberta Grossman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Wxidea (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wxidea-My Extraordinary Gratitude and Thanks to You

Thank you again for your fine suggestions and timely messages. You have helped me immensely in finally getting my draft https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Roberta_Grossman published.

Ahurvitz2 (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Roberta Grossman page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]