User talk:AhmetSanjar
July 2021
[edit]We do not start an edit war to get our way, we do not add our unsourced personal opinions to articles as if the are facts, and we use article talk pages, not edit summaries, to discuss article content. Edit summaries are to describe changes we make, but not to argue them. I am inviting you to discuss your reversals here. Your new text, which does not coincide with the cited source, will be removed again if you do not convince a consensus of editors on that talk page that it is legitimately sourced in some other way. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, I gave a clear reason for why I reversed your reversal. There is also a clear explanation beneath your complaint by another user on the Hazrat Inayat Khan talk page. Could you explain why you think this is a falsification with all that in mind?
- Please indent and sign your comments! We are all supposed to do that. These are guidelines. It's not difficult to learn, and it's considerate.
- We should discuss the article only on that talk page, not here. I wrote to you here about your actions, not primarily about the article. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
AhmetSanjar, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi AhmetSanjar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC) |