Jump to content

User talk:Ahmad mohammadawi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Ahmad mohammadawi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ahmad mohammadawi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 13:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Huntster (t @ c) 14:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad mohammadawi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How would I give you a proof that I am the author of this photo? Ahmad mohammadawi (talk) 14:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In general, Wikipedians who have taken a photograph themselves upload a high quality version, conversely, copying from another website yields low resolution images. 16:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad mohammadawi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What about down-scaling resolution so that it's easier to load and upload a photo? Ahmad mohammadawi (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a valid unblock request...the only way you will be unblocked is to show that you understand the copyright issues here and that you will not upload or otherwise try to include copyrighted material in articles again. To answer the question: you would have to provide evidence beyond question that the image was created by you and that *you* hold its copyright (not the Iranian government). Without such incontrovertible evidence, we cannot host that image. Huntster (t @ c) 03:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad mohammadawi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can give you dozens of similar cases, but it seems you're so biased and have double standards!!, I've even supplied an official Iranian news source but you still say it's a copyright violation!! Ahmad mohammadawi (talk) 07:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 11:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reply to your last edit, it seems you do not understand copyright infringement. The work was produced either by the Iranian government or an Iranian news organisation, I don't remember which at this moment. You have continually uploaded the image claiming ownership/copyright over it. There is no evidence that you actually own this image. If you do not actually own the copyright over this image, then you do not have the right to claim it as your own and upload it to Commons. If you do not understand this, please say so. Huntster (t @ c) 08:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]