User talk:Agof K.P.2

April 2022

Hello, I'm Armegon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Frankenstein Conquers the World have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Stop removing the full title. It is disruptive. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing. Armegon (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC) Armegon (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so why do you insist on vandalizing the page? it was already full title and you add your own fanfiction. it's literally furigana. do you know what is furigana? why do you insist that you know better what is the title of a japanese movie than japanese people? （フランケンシュタインたいバラゴン(東宝特撮映画全史 1983) can't you read? why do you think you know better than the creators of the movie? 2007 2004 2015 if you have no idea what you are editing why do you insist after being corrected? did you even read the description of diff? it's like most obvious self evident. read furigana first. stop using google translate. the section is literally hepburn aka romanization, not fanfication. the title of the movie is literally spelled for you letter by letter. letter by letter フランケンシュタインたいバラゴン. how did you made up that part? where did you get it? there is literally furigana for you spelling what is written in plain text. and it's not what you are trying to add Agof K.P.2 (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, watch your tone and behavior. It's best if you read WP:5P4, WP:CIVIL, and WP:FAITH. If you can't have a mature discussion without resulting to disrespect, then your tenure on Wiki will likely be short-lived. Secondly, it's also best if you also read WP:SHOT. Going to WP:AN (like you did here) over something trivial like this was a premature move on your end. You should have brought the issue to the talk page of Frankenstein, not Eiga-Kevin2's talk page. He is allowed to delete anything on his own talk page. Hence why he deleted your section. Thirdly, you keep removing the hepburn for 地底怪獣 (Chitei Kaijū). That's in the Japanese title, you can see it on the poster. There's no reason to remove it from the hepburn translation. Armegon (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what my tone and behaviour? is it because i'm not white enough for you? WP:FAITH is purely for you to not outrigh remove everyone else's edit and instantly calling them vandals after zero research on topic you don't know. despite being self evident, i didn't leave the reasoning field empty. i clearly stated the reason. especially where it was so wrong it was self obvious. even if you have no idea what is furigana you still would go up to down right to left, meaning it will always be frankestein tai baragon and only after that your fanfiction. you can't have mature discussion you are instantly undoing edits and insult other people. well meaning i can delete you from my page and just undo your vandalism. but i won't do that because i'm not you. despite being wrong and after being given plenty of sources your only craving is to just insult me more and more

burden of proof is on you, how do you take hepburn domaitaru yasukemono and end up with whatever you came up with? hepburn is for the title of the movie and hepburn is for romanization, not to make up new deeper meaning on the fly that has zero relation to the page. how come you take hepburn tsuchinanzo yoshijōyō and end up with that? if you like hepburn, try actually reading about it Hepburn romanization. that clearly explains that hepburn is syllabic and has zero relation to kanji. and the poster gives you all the syllables Agof K.P.2 (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there are literally 2800 hits on google total of all possible spellings combined with pages being fan wikis. is this a joke? did you ever though to stop defending your own fanfiction, stop throwing insult after insult after insult directly at me and doubling down on being wrong, and instead of feeling like defensive to actually at least try to address any of the sources or points? even if you decided to hate me personally you still didn't counter any of the points --Agof K.P.2 (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"is it because i'm not white enough for you?" I could easily report you for that because it's disrespectful and in violation of WP:NOTHERE, but I'm gonna let that slide and give you the benefit of the doubt because it's pretty clear that English is not your first language. What you're removing is 地底怪獣 (Chitei Kaijū). That is part of the Japanese title. The hepburn/romanization is even supported by secondary sources, see here, see here, and see here. Armegon (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1 i literally gave you three instances where the CREATORS OWNERS AND DISTRIBUTORS TOHO show the real name. your "sources" are a fansite, a web 1.0 site that died 10 years ago and a no-name site. if a site cites wikipedia it is not a source

2 you are literally ignoring that 地底怪獣 is tsuchinanzo yoshijōyō per hepburn

3 you are literally ignoring word order

4 you are literally ignoring hepburn syllabism

5 you are literally ignoring furigana

you are disrespectful since the moment you started trolling me Agof K.P.2 (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. I'm reporting you. Enjoy being blocked, sweetheart! Armegon (talk) 03:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

troll Agof K.P.2 (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Chip3004 (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

where? there is nothing there? i can't wait to report the trolls Agof K.P.2 (talk) 03:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

on what grounds? one user with long history of edit wars is outright harrasing me, another ignores every language rule. so where is the arbitrage? my account is more than 16 years old and is auto-patrolled, what of this is "trolling"? why some users are allowed to participate in constant edit wars, and trying to erase other users, and i was banned over a false report from a user who did edit war to begin with, ignoring the talk page Agof K.P.2 (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agof K.P.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sixteen years old auto-patrolled account is obviously in no way here for trolling. blocked because of a false report by regular edit wars creator. users literally deny japanese language rules and hepburn rules ignore primary sources and refuse to talk insta-deleting any links to sources, insisting on their self-created edit unsupported by anything — 1000 (one thousand) hits on google and all are fan site that cite wikipedia. also was blocked without any arbitrage despite 16 years long history of wikipedia contributions Agof K.P.2 (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock request. You lost me at is it because i'm not white enough for you? Also, sixteen years old auto-patrolled account — what? Who? You? How? Where? Finally as a non-native English speaker, I found this unblock request challenging to read (as brief as it was) because the user does not use any capitalization (even for the word "Japanese"). El_C 07:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FWIW the Agof K.P.2 account does have a 13 (not 16) year history outside of en Special:CentralAuth/Agof_K.P.2 although the number of contributions is still quite low. It appears they have autoreviewer status on the Russian wikipedia. I have no idea on the quality of the contributions in any of those other projects. Agof K.P.2: ultimately your contributions here are what matter. And you were edit warring including well breaking 3RR. You approached an editor about your dispute directly but it was the wrong editor which you were told when you opened an AN. And while you did speak to the editor who first reverted you when they approached you above, your only other attempt to communicate with them was to template them. More importantly, wherever else you may have talked to editors, the article talk page hasn't been touched in 9 months (I said 21 months at AN, my mistake). Meanwhile you managed to not only make 6 reverts in about 24 minutes and a total I think of 8 reverts in about 2-3 days, but mentioned 3RR in one of your edit summaries where you broke it. Getting into an edit war is a bad idea, getting into an edit war when you haven't touched the article talk page especially so. You then got into an edit war on ANEW the edit warring noticeboard, and ANIV. If you are genuinely not a troll, it'll help if you explain why your edits look a lot like it. At the very least you'll should explain how you plan to move on from the editing dispute without commenting on any other editor. Nil Einne (talk) 14:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022-2006=16. you can see even here that i asked to ban me and remove all my pages in 2007 = 15. i was contributing anonymously fixing typos so as to literally not ever having a talk page and to not care about low quality of wikipedia. but i never needed to fix my en page before the fascist invasion started and half the internet was blocked. so you say i somehow was edit warring alone with no one else involved? i though you need two sided to break 3rr to start edit war. i wrote all 3 people and was deleted. if you open the edits in questions i wasn't even trying to have the correct orthography anymore i asked for at least a reliable source. and even that request was erased in a personal crusade to make me not exist anymore.

as you open the talk page the user didn't get an answer in 2 years. they did write on the talk page. i was writing on the talk page for 16 years, not a single reply, because wikipedia never reply to talk pages only to admin arbitrage (and i won every single one). people who add their fanfiction to wikipedia they are not interested in talking they are interesting in defending it. so yes pleasase tell me what will happen if i to add the to talk page? it will be ignored forever for as long as the fanfiction remains on the main page because talk pages are useless, and i did write to all three people before doing anything. and i did contact the admins first and asked to step in but it was closed and you saw it. i retracted everything against first user the second i was corrected and apologised, and we did even talk with them after it.

what is right now in the article is against every single possible rule. even if we pretend that there is no such thing furigana or that hepburn doesn't exist, that the kanji entirely doesn't match what is made up by users. that japanese people can't speak japanese, that rights owner doesn't know how to write in their own language about their own property that they created, if we just read what's on the poster? top to bottom right to left on the poster, or top to bottom left to right on the title card, baragon always comes first --Agof K.P.2 (talk) 15:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it was not me who started any edit wars. i was never the first to do 3rr. people protect the incorrect status quo and refuse to communicate at all intentionally ignoring every possible rule. and i didn't got into edit war anew my voice was literally erased. there is the comments section to talk and the user that is a repeated offender who enjoys edits war and openly writes that they break every rule in wikipedia was erasing anything i wrote defending my case. what's this? a regular law breaker can run to admins create a case about their own crime but blaming other side and then entirely erase them and erase their voice and leave no right to defend? i was not "edit warring" i was removing vandalism. the person literally was removing me from my case while i never did the same. that's lynching not arbitrage Agof K.P.2 (talk) 15:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what all that other stuff is. Special:Log/Agof_K.P.2 says: [04:10, 28 March 2022 User account Agof K.P.2 talk contribs block was created automatically.] There are no contributions displayed prior to that date. Anyway, TPA revoked for the lynching reference. Otherwise, I didn't bother reading their comments too closely seeing as they (still) can't be bothered to capitalize their sentences, despite my expressed request for them to do so (i.e. this is not a chatroom).

But I did warn those two users a couple of days ago against removing this user's comments from AN3, or from undoing them on their own talk page. But that's of course moot now. Be it ineptitude (WP:CIR) or bad faith (WP:PACT), it's pretty pointless to continue to allow Agof K.P.2 to ahve talk access at this time. The usual personal attacks, of a racial nature for some reason (first with that "not white enough for you," and now with the "lynching"), continue. And, otherwise, there is still poor engagement; poor effort at engagement, obviously. El_C 09:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 09:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]