User talk:Agnosiophobia

Welcome!

Hi Agnosiophobia! I noticed your contributions to Ingeo and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming me!

I am excited to improve Wikipedia however I can, and I am looking forward to creating new articles on obscure topics not yet covered. I have always had a passion for learning since discovering the intricacies of certain fields of science early on. Being able to write about some of my passions on a readily available encyclopedia such as Wikipedia has me feeling very inspired.

I already am making plans on what I would like to add, once more accustomed to the interface, and I have no plans on leaving Wikipedia in the coming future, so long as there is still more to add and update.

The tutorial and encouragement are very much appreciated! Thank you kindly! Agnosiophobia (talk) 01:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ca were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Three of the sources do not even mention the phobia. Medical claims should be sourced to "review articles (especially systematic reviews) published in reputable medical journals, academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers, and guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies" per WP:MEDRS, not pop science websites and user-generated Q & A sites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Agnosiophobia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Agnosiophobia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]