User talk:Agnez Mo fan

January 2023

Hello, I'm M.Ashraf333. An edit that you recently made to User talk:Badak Jawa seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Agnez Mo fan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello, thanks for posting a message on my talk page, I'd love it if you appreciated the article that was created and would like to offer you to edit the article on English Wikipedia. Are you ready? Badak Jawa (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it will get deleted in English so I would rather wait till there are more sources for Maurice Novoa. Agnez Mo fan (talk) 07:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agnez Mo fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock I was translating an article to English for another user Agnez Mo fan (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). When combined with the overlap in editing, this is a pretty easy decline. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.