User talk:Agerra

Welcome!

Hello, Agerra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

 ~ clearthought 16:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

This was a good catch.- Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 14:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wildflower Cafe

The article Wildflower Cafe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 11:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't given any indication from a reliable source to show us that this locally-important cafe has a place in an international encyclopedia. The PROD template allows a week for anyone to object to deletion, as you've done, so it's not impatient to PROD an article like this. As you've dePRODded it, I'll take it to AfD for a wider opinion. PamD 16:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wildflower Cafe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wildflower Cafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildflower Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 16:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I see you've blanked the page, so it should get speedy-deleted as "only author blanks the page", CSD G-7. As soon as it goes I'll withdraw the AfD nomination. That means that if you re-create the article, when you find some independent Reliable Sources, it won't risk being nominated for speedy deletion as "Re-creation of a page deleted after a deletion discussion", WP:G4. I'm sorry that your first article creation for a few years has gone badly. I hope you can find some other topics to write about: remember to include reliable independent published sources right from the start, and Happy Editing! PamD 19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Katie Porter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]