User talk:AgeOfAntiquity

January 2021

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I see many of your summaries include accusing Quoctoann171 as a "Vietnam based POV pushing user". Unless you actually have any evidence of it, please do not attack other editors. It's also particularly ironic considering your other edits where you are pushing POV of your own. What's your previous account? ShelteredCook (talk) 08:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my edits and treating me as a sockpuppet. Do a CU if you are doubtful. I just created this account and this is the only account that I have. When I mention "POV Pushing", I was clearly referring to the factually incorrect content made Quoctoann171 and accusing someone of POV Pushing is not a personal attack directed to another user when clearly there was editorial bias made by the user Quoctoann171 s and well as a number of anonymous IPs. I didn't use any threatening or disparaging insults, invective's, or expletives directed to other people. Read my edit summaries again and stop trying to revert my edits when I clearly have added citations to some of them as required.

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. Your recent edit(s) to the page Chinese knotting appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kpg jhp jm 08:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my edits and treating me as a sockpuppet. Instead of alleging me of bias, why don't you check my citations that I added and review the contributions that I added more carefully.

I have reviewed your contributions before reverting and on further review it can be seen you have added no citations to that article and why change accepted sourced content. Kpg jhp jm 08:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about you, I'm talking the other user ShelteredCook who accused me of being a sockpuppet and labelled me as person who deliberately "attacked" another editor user:Quoctoann171 when clearly the edits he made to those articles were biased and factually incorrect. I added citations to some articles that clearly required citations but there are others that clearly don't and were erroneously added. The previous user's changes that I later made changes to provided no citations either and edited on a whim. I checked the reference and the user that I reverted had clearly added factually incorrect information in the article.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ShelteredCook (talk) 10:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking out for me and proving my innocence. AgeOfAntiquity (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AgeOfAntiquity, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AgeOfAntiquity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)