User talk:Agavtouch

I would think so. Juda S. Engelmayer 03:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juda - how do you spell NPOV? -- Agavtouch (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think you are a competing PR firm, you are clearly have nothing better to do today and need to get a life — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrhando26 (talk • contribs)

I think that your personal attacks have no place in Wikipedia. -- Agavtouch (talk) 21:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

There is a huge difference between NPOV and a non qualifying article. The purpose of Wikipedia's community is to help create encyclopedic references for noteworthy people, places, things and history, and help edit those that are not up to par. In all your rants about fancy Wiki codes like COI and NPOV, you still cannot establish that what is posted is not noteworthy. Indeed, your vehement pressing of this issue is noteworthy in itself - especially when it turns out that you are some competitor or a PR blogger. -- Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juda, you may twist and turn and spin upside down, but it will not change the fact that you are violating NPOV and SPAM policy at Wikipedia. -- Agavtouch (talk) 21:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agavtouch, please moderate your tone, remember WP:CIVIL and also that you have apparently been using sockpuppet accounts, which is itself a serious problem. I acknowledge that Judeal has violated WP:COI in his recent edits. I'd like both of you to stand down for the moment. -- Michaelbusch (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please perform a checkuser if you believe that I am someone's sockpuppet. I will stand down. Thank you and enjoy a great weekend. -- Agavtouch (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser is only invoked in extreme cases, due to a shortage of sysops with checkuser permissions. I'm just trying to stop edit warring here. -- Michaelbusch (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

While I disagree with you wholeheartedly regarding both of your current AfDs, I must point out that you seem to be making claims of WP:3RR violations, which seem to have absolutely nothing to do with the policy in question. Please read the relevant policy before making any further such claims of violations. It does little to enhance the credibility of your argument. Alansohn (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Agavtouch for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Alansohn (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The two socks were blocked. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]