User talk:Agastya11

Yeh kya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.93.13 (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Agastya11, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Drat8sub (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, core policies and guidelines

Already mentioned at the welcome note, though specifying some important principles, guidelines and policies of wikipedia. Since you are a newly registered one, you must go through WP:5P, WP:VER, WP:CITE, WP:RELY, WP:NOT along with all the above links provided, which will help you to grow here. You may ask for any guidance. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesh Pokhriyal July 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rhode Island Red (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhode Island Red: Avoid posting a generic warning template if you are actively involved in the edit war yourself; it can be seen as aggressive. Consider writing your own note to the user specifically appropriate for the situation, with a view to explicitly cooling things down.Manabimasu (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring without engaging on the Talk page is the problem; the template is simply a formality warning the user that if they continue to make the same edit without engaging or trying to gain consensus will lead to a block. That, and leaving a note on the article TPG is more than sufficient. Rhode Island Red (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, South India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 17:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hindustan Awam Morcha, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sanjjanaa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banking Regulation Act, 1949, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moratorium. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Ktin. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vijay Mallya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ktin (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Geeta Shakya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geeta Shakya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geeta Shakya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bihar Legislative Assembly. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K. Narayan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, K. Narayan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mr-5 / ^{M ✉ / C🖋} 15:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Narayan has been accepted

K. Narayan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a summary with your edits

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Vikram Vincent 08:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agnimitra Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sushil Kumar Modi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GST.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi! I have undone two edits of yours as you had not provided references to substantiate the changes. See this and this. Also do use accurate edit summaries as the one you used was misleading. Best! Vikram Vincent 12:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Agricultural produce market committee. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 10:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BoAt Lifestyle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, BoAt Lifestyle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agnimitra Paul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnimitra Paul, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnimitra Paul (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Agastya11

Thank you for creating Suneet Sharma.

User:MRRaja001, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A useful article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MRRaja001}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MRRaja001 ^(talk) 14:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vijayanagara district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited N. V. Ramana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deepak Gupta and Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 02:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 04:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, specifically your wanton flouting of copyright and your editing with complete disregard for warnings about the India-Pakistan topic area.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agastya11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry if I have violated any rules of Wikipedia, however I have reverted several edits which I think have been disruptive and not properly sourced. I regret any mistakes I may have made. Please do look into the issue. Agastya11 (talk) 04:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agastya11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request you to unblock as I understand what i have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. I ensure you that I shall make constructive edits and not give another chance to be blocks. Request you to please consider my request and give me another chance. My sincere apologies.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agastya11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understood that I have been blocked for causing disruptive editing especially to the 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election page. I

assure you that I have gone through all the Wikipedia guidelines and understand my responsibility. I will not continue to cause disruptive edits knowingly and shall make productive contributions only. Here on I will not edit any page without proper source and not revert previous edits without any good explanations. I will make sure I substantiate my edits in the summary box.  Here on I will make sure that I do not flout any copyright norms and edit with complete cautiousness about the India-Pakistan topic area. I request you to unblock me as I have familiarised myself with the wiki guidelines and understood my mistake. Please consider my apologies.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request due to the subsequent sockpuppet abuse. Sasquatch t|c 23:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Agastya11 (talk) 01:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agastya11. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BoAt Lifestyle

Hello, Agastya11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BoAt Lifestyle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BoAt Lifestyle

Hello, Agastya11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BoAt Lifestyle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]