User talk:Affable Familiar

Welcome!

Hello, Affable Familiar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 03:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Affable Familiar, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Affable Familiar. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for ignoring image upload warnings. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

feydey (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Affable Familiar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi,
(1) If the block for 'ignoring image upload warnings' is in relation to images I have added to edits, then can I say that have been scrupulous in contacting the image rights holders - Derek Ridgers, Danny Flynn, Michelle Olley - for permission, and in then requesting them to email their permission to Wikipedia, which they have all done.

(2) If the block is in regards to 'orphaned' images accumulating in the talk section of my user page, then for that I have to say that I simply did not know that they were stored there (hence the accumulation!); and I have now removed those images.And I now know where to go to remove any in future, if needs be.

(3) In light of this, could you re-examine this case - I think if you look at both the detail and the stylistic compliance of the pages I have recently created, you can see that I take my contributions very seriously. Many thanks. AF

Decline reason:

If you knew the policy, why didn't you evidence it on the upload pages? Furthermore, if you knew the policy you would be aware that images released for use on Wikipedia can't be used on Wikipeda per se, because Wikipedia is ideally supposed to be the free encyclopaedia and items need to be PD or CC. Have these emails arrived at Wikipedia, have you evidenced them in the pages beyond "an email has been sent?" Furthermore, you have no evidenced a fair use rationalise on half a dozen images that I can see on your talk page. You need to show more awareness of the files you upload; instead you have missed that most of your rationales are broken because you copy-and-paste them without due care and attention. Sorry, but I don't find points (1) and (3) convincing. I suggest you spend the remaining 12 or so hours re-reading policy. SGGH ^ping! 16:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Affable Familiar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear SGGH, I can't provide evidence that the emails from the copyright holders have arrived at Wikipedia because I don't work for Wikipeidia so I am not privvy to the contents of Wikipedia's email 'in-box'; I do know that I emailed the image creators/copyright holders for permission, they granted permission, and when the image creators/copyright holders emailed Wikipedia authorisation they also 'cc'ed me the email, which is evidence that it has been sent. For evidence that Wikipedia has read and acknowledged the consent, then wikipedia needs to confirm receipt of the emails on the site.
There is a Catch-22 here in that an image has to be uploaded first to Wikipedia in order to have an image file name to pass on to the copyright holder so that they can use this file name as a reference to grant use of the correct image - so there is an unavoidable period when an image is uploaded to the site whilst image use is still being sought from the copyright holder.
The rationales were not cut-and-pasted 'without due care and attention' but because the rationale was the same for most of the images as 90% of the images were from excatly the same source, ie, the same creator/copyright holder.
And, sorry, if you don't find point (3) convincing I suggest you spend some time looking at the many, many entries on Wikipedia that are sorely lacking in either subject detail, links, or supporting references (or all three), and which I have tried to ensure are all present in the entries I created. But thanks for considering my appeal anyway. I'll try to include as much detail as is possible in future image submissions. AF

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Danny-lifeinabox.jpg

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

.
* Direct illustration of subject's work so no free image equivalent available.
* Image use authorised by creator and copyright holder, Danny Flynn, via email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

I have tagged File:Danny-lifeinabox.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny-lifeinabox2.jpg

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work:

To illustrate the subject in question
Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information
On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights.
Fair use

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale.
This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use.

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

.
* Direct illustration of subject's work so no free image equivalent available.
* Image use authorised by creator and copyright holder, Danny Flynn, via email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

I have tagged File:Danny-lifeinabox2.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Danny Flynn - lifeoutofabox 2 1.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Danny Flynn - lifeoutofabox 2 1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Danny_Flynn_-_lifeoutofabox_2_1.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Danny_Flynn_-_lifeoutofabox_2_1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Danny_Flynn_-_letterpress.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Danny_Flynn_-_letterpress.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE: Permission for image use has already been requested and granted from the copyright holder, Danny Flynn, and an email confirming authorisation of image use has already been sent to premissions@wikimedia.org by the copyright holder, Danny Flynn. Affable Familiar Affable Familiar (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Derek_Ridgers_-_Michelle_Olley.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Derek_Ridgers_-_Michelle_Olley.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE: Permission for image use has already been requested and granted from the copyright holder, DEREK RIDGERS, and an email confirming authorisation of image use has already been sent to premissions@wikimedia.org by the copyright holder, DEREK RIDGERS. Affable Familiar Affable Familiar (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) Do you know when this e-mail was sent? I've done a search of the OTRS sytem and have not found it. If it was sent within the past hour or two it may not yet have appeared. If it was earlier than that, a date may help me locate it. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, never mind. I've found it. It wasn't too recent to appear; it was just earlier than I had looked. Evidently, he sent it some weeks ago and it just hadn't been handled in the queue yet. I'm afraid we've got quite a backlog. :/ I've logged the permission. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have an email from Derek Ridgers on 04/08/2010 confirming that he has sent permission for the image to be used to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. This is the second or third time that Mr Ridgers has been kind enough to resend his confirmation after the image keeps being taken down. Is there not stored database information on this? It seems a shame that a good image should continually be removed, to the detriment of the article, even when there is official authorisation sent (three times) from the photographer. Thanks. --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) 13:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The official authorization is not complete until an agent logs the permission at the image, as I've now done. Before searching for the image below, let me see if I can figure out why this might not have been done in the past. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Okay, thanks for that. Hopefully the image will stay up now. --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) 13:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the first time he wrote, he did not provide us an explicit license. He was told how to do so, but did not respond (this happens routinely enough that I suspect we get stuck in people's spam filters). We received two later e-mails from him on some other images that also did not provide explicit license (Ticket:2010051510021019; Ticket:2010051910039235). This one wasn't included in either batch, though. Again, he did not respond to request for clarification. So far as I can see, he had only written us about this image once before, and the communication he provided us was insufficient, I'm afraid. Speaking of those two unusable tickets, are you in regular contact with him? I'm afraid that we still don't seem to have usable license releases for those images, which will also need to be deleted. :/ I can give you a list of the images involved or I can write to him, if you think he will see and respond to my e-mail. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, could you provide me with details of which Images still need authorisation? I will then email Mr Ridgers with a request for the correct authorisation for them. It is usually the CC-BY-SA license that is used. Thanks. --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) Affable Familiar (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I'll do that as soon as I complete the matter below. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The images mentioned in those emails for which we still need license are:

As you can see by the red links, some of these have already been deleted. If Mr. Ridgers sends permission, please drop a note at my talk page to let me know, and I'll see if I can locate it so he can also bypass the queue. No need to reupload the images; when the permission comes, I can pull them up. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for that. I'll email Mr Ridgers now with these image file names. (And he's just forwarded to me your email to him from a few minutes ago about the Michelle Olley image, so that seems to be fine.) --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) Affable Familiar (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Michelle Olley is fine. And please refer to me only as Moonriddengirl here. To avoid some of the harassment that administrators sometimes receive, I try to keep an anonymous online presence. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've just emailed Mr Ridgers to ask him to reconfirm by email authorisation for the above (blue) image file names. --Affable Familiar (talk)Affable Familiar (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he confirms for the red linked ones, too, I can "undelete" them. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Flynn

Dear Moonriddengirl - I also have a problem with images on 'Danny Flynn (printer)' sometimes being removed even though permission has been requested and granted by the copyright holder, Danny Flynn, and a confirmation email sent to permission-en@wikimedia.org by the image copyright holder, Danny Flynn. Do Wiki editors not always check whether or not a permission is still in the backlog? Thanks for your help. --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) 13:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if they could, but Wiki editors can't check this, I'm afraid. The e-mail system is protected for privacy concerns, so only a few agents are able to access these mails. The system was created under the presumption that 7 days was plenty of time to handle the backlog. Unfortunately, we get thousands of letters (many of which are not usable) and have had some difficulty retaining qualified agents to handle them. The good news (such as it is) is that when those letters are processed, we are able to then restore the images, so they are not lost forever. I'm looking at Danny Flynn now. I see that his first e-mail was also unusable, but his later e-mail seems to do the trick. There are a lot of images involved, though, so it will take me a few minutes to process. I'll update you after I have done so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the update. I also tried to check the outstanding tickets for the Derek Ridgers images that you included above, but I cannot log into Wikimedia with my Wikipedia username/password. Do I need to create a new username/password for that site? --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) Affable Familiar (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry; I should have explained. This is the private queue that only a few individuals can access. I recorded those ticket numbers here so that I would be able to easily find them to give you the list. :) There is a problem still with Mr. Flynn's permission. I have written him to explain. If he reads his e-mail and clarifies, we should be able to resolve those images pretty swiftly. Since there is an agent assigned to him now, so long as he uses the ticket number in his subject line, he doesn't have to go through the queue again but will drop directly in my inbox. That done, I'll generate that list for you above. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll ask Mr Flynn to clarify the permissions, or to forward the message to me so I can see what the problem with permissions is. As he has already given permission, it must just be a problem with the wording, or perhaps an incorrectly described license. Or perhaps you could point out what the exact problem with the image permissions at the moment? --Affable Famliliar ^(talk) Affable Familiar (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm limited to what I can communicate by the confidentiality agreement, but I don't think it's stepping over that line to say that the problem involves inconsistent terms and the e-mail address from which the permission originated. We're required to verify the connection with the copyright holder, and I can't at this point. Both easily resolved. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Could you further explain what this means: 'We're required to verify the connection with the copyright holder'? In the meantime, I've just emailed Mr Flynn to ask him to check for your email and then respond to it; or for him to describe to me what the problem is so I can then suggest the correct wording. --Affable Familiar (talk)Affable Familiar (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simply that when we are contacted by somebody with a public identity, we need to make sure that the person contacting us is the individual. I have never myself that I know of encountered a case where they were not, but this is a requirement of the Wikimedia Foundation to avoid copyright fraud (see Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries, down at the very bottom past the bold word "Email address"). This is a frequent hurdle we run into, and it generally resolves within a day or so. I've explained the easiest ways to do this to him, and if none of those work for him we can find others. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've received a forwarded email from Mr Flynn saying that he's replied to the Wikipedia email - (ref: [Ticket#2010052710028115]) - confirming his authorisation of the images. BUT I noticed in the Wiki email sent in order to confirm identity, you were also emailing Mr Flynn through www.dannyflynn.com, but that is a DIFFERENT Danny Flynn! That is the website of an illustrator of the same name (he also has a Wikipedia entry), so no wonder you received no reply. It seems that Mr Flynn (our Mr Flynn, the printer) did not notice that part of your email to him. So I've asked him to reply to that as well. -- Affable Familiar (talk) Affable Familiar (talk) 23:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Interesting that there are two. :) I'll log in to the account to see what I can make of the permission; if he is a different Danny Flynn, we may need to connect him to a different site. By the way, I have removed some of the information from your note here and at my talk page for privacy concerns. You may have overlooked my request above that you refer to me only as Moonriddengirl here. Like you, I choose to edit under a pen name, and per policy to keep other information private. I'll be back after I've read his e-mail. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; I've communicated with him about the concerns, which are not yet resolved. But to clarify, we have not communicated with any other Danny Flynn. All of our e-mails to Mr. Flynn have been conducted by hitting reply, so it automatically returns to him. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Part of the email Mr Flynn received from Wikipedia said "Thank you for your willingness to donate this content to Wikipedia. We have not been able to validate this authorization at this time, because we need to first connect your e-mail address to your website, <http://www.dannyflynn.com/>." That's what I was referring to when I mentioned Wikipedia's attempted contact through the wrong website (which is the website of the other Danny Flynn, the illustrator). However, our Mr Flynn (the printer), has information on a university research website you may be able to use for verification. -- Affable Familiar Affable Familiar (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Re: privacy concerns. I didn't really understand, at the time, or even now, your request of me to only refer to you by your username because that username is all I know you by anyway. I can't think how I would have used anything else. But, anyway, whatever changes feel you have to make to protect yourself are fine by me. Though it's a shame you have to take any measures at all. -- Affable Familiar Affable Familiar (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Maybe it wasn't clear that I'm the person who has been communicating with Mr. Flynn and Mr. Ridgers. I thought it would be, from my saying, "I have written him to explain". When referring to those e-mails, please do not use my name. (Update: he has now verified File:Danny - Hopper.jpg, File:Danny-Kylie.JPG, File:Danny-prints_small.jpg, File:Danny-Skin.jpg, File:Danny-Nick.JPG, File:Danny-lifeinabox2-small.jpg, File:Danny-lifeinabox2.jpg, File:Danny-lifeinabox.jpg, File:Danny Flynn - letterpress.jpg, File:Danny - Hopper.jpg, File:House Of Flora - Letterdress-belt.jpg, File:Danny-prints small.jpg, File:Danny - Lynch.JPG, File:Danny-Keith.JPG, File:Danny - Hooker.JPG, File:Danny-Costello.jpg and File:Danny-Skin.jpg.; Ticket:2010052710028115. As these seem to be designs made incorporating Mr. Ridgers' photographs, we will need his verification of permission as well. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. That's you. I thought your emails were as well as the others. Anyway, I've emailed Mr Ridgers for the further authorisations. -- Affable Familiar 17:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) Once we get that, I can mark those images. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Danny-Costello.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Danny-Costello.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE: Permission for image use has already been requested and granted from the copyright holder, DANNY FLYNN, and an email confirming authorisation of image use has already been sent to premissions@wikimedia.org by the copyright holder, DANNY FLYNN. Affable Familiar Affable Familiar (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Danny-Keith.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Danny-Keith.JPG, which you've sourced to Dann Flynn. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:House Of Flora logo.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:House Of Flora logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 11:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:House Of Flora - Letterdress-belt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:House Of Flora - Letterdress-belt.jpg, which you've sourced to Danny Flynn. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg, which you've sourced to INSUFFICIENT OTRS OVER 1 MONTH OLD. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DerekRidgers1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DerekRidgers1.jpg, which you've sourced to INSUFFICIENT OTRS OVER 1 MONTH OLD. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Salon Kitty.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Salon Kitty.jpg, which you've sourced to INSUFFICIENT OTRS OVER 1 MONTH OLD. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Derek Ridgers - Stare - Portraits From the Endless Night.jpg

Hello, Affable Familiar!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Derek Ridgers - Stare - Portraits From the Endless Night.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Derek Ridgers - Skinheads.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Derek Ridgers - Skinheads.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Derek Ridgers - Stare - Portraits From the Endless Night.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Derek Ridgers - Stare - Portraits From the Endless Night.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Derek Ridgers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Bailey and Terry O'Neill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Finger Print 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Finger Print 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Thanks. There was a small error in the file name: rather than File:Finger Print 1.jpg, it should be titled File:Finger Print 1 (smaller).jpg. The correct file has no been uploaded - and there is already emailed permission for this second image file with Wikipedia from its author, Danny Flynn, emailed on 1st March 2012. Affable Familiar (talk) 11:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~==File permission problem with File:Every Bodies Enemies 1.JPG==~~

Thanks for uploading File:Every Bodies Enemies 1.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~==File permission problem with File:Danny - Enemies - Skin (smaller).JPG==~~

Thanks for uploading File:Danny - Enemies - Skin (smaller).JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~==File permission problem with File:Danny - Keith (smaller).JPG==~~

Thanks for uploading File:Danny - Keith (smaller).JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found OTRS ticket and set it up to cover the 3 images above - it does not cover http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Finger_Print_1.jpg Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the pseudo speedy for a proper FfD to allow full discussion and consensus - I've added your comments on the discussion page. You are free to add or edit as you please. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Just so you know what images have OTRS...

Ticket 2012030110008908

Danny - Enemies - Skin (smaller).jpg
Danny - Enemies - Keith (smaller).jpg
Every Bodies Enemies 1.jpg
Danny Flynn - letterpress (smaller).jpg
Finger Print 1 (smaller).jpg
Finger Print 3 (smaller).jpg
Finger Print 4 (smaller).jpg
House Of Flora - Letterdress-belt.jpg

Ticket 2012030210000324

Flora McLean - red hair hat.jpg
House Of Flora - bracelets (smaller).jpg
House Of Flora - accessories 2 - autumn-winter 09.jpg
House Of Flora - accessories 2 - autumn-winter 09 (smaller).jpg
House Of Flora - Spex 8.jpg (image in OTRS was Spex 8 - text says Spex 7 - I am assuming a simple typo and will tell House of Flora)

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny-prints small.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny-prints small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny-Costello.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny-Costello.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny - Hopper.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny - Hopper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny - Hooker.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny - Hooker.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny - Lynch.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny - Lynch.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from the copyright holder Danny Flynn has previously been sent for this image but I have asked him to email you permisssion again - the requeast was the evening 3rd March 2012 so he will probably not respond with a permission email to Wikipedia until the 4th March. Thanks for you patience. Affable Familiar (talk) 21:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Michelle Olley 2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Olley 2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for the use of these two images on the entry 'Michelle Olley' was sent to me and to permissions-en@wikimedia.org by the copyright holder, Michelle Olley on 6th March 2012. But, as you request, I have today (12th March) forwarded the email again to permissions-en@wikimedia.org . I hope this will suffice. Affable Familiar (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Michelle Olley 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Olley 3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for the use of these two images on the entry 'Michelle Olley' was sent to me and to permissions-en@wikimedia.org by the copyright holder, Michelle Olley on 6th March 2012. But, as you request, I have today (12th March) forwarded the email again to permissions-en@wikimedia.org . I hope this will suffice. Affable Familiar (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If permission has been sent, you should tag the images with {{OTRS pending}} to prevent deletion. I have tagged these images with that tag now. No need to resend anything. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Magnus Jansson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to CGI and Orpheum Theatre

Assorted Nuts Animation Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orpheum Theatre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Theatre Dogs poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Theatre Dogs poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference formatting

Thank you for adding much-needed references to the article Derek Ridgers. (Note that many more still need to be added.)

When you add a reference with the URL for a source, you have to do some formatting. What's the title of the web page and of the website? When was the material written? When did you access it? As a sample, I did one for you. There was then a complication, as it turned out that the very same reference was cited elsewhere in the article. Well, here's what I did. -- Hoary (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye (The Czars album)

Hello, Affable Familiar, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Goodbye (The Czars album), appears to be directly copied from http://bellaunion.com/artists/the-czars/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Goodbye (The Czars album) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 00:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The text on the Bella Union website you provide the link to is simply a collection of quotations from reviews of the 'Goodbye' album so the text is not actually copyright of Bella Union; and in regards to the use of the review quotes themselves, they are of sufficiant brevity (short word count) to fall within the category of fair use limitations set out for brief quotations from reviews. Thanks.

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goodbye (The Czars album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mojo and Uncut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark de Rond may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your uploads may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:House Of Flora - accessories 2 - autumn-winter 09.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:House Of Flora - accessories 2 - autumn-winter 09.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:House Of Flora logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:House Of Flora logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Affable Familiar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Ridgers - Morrissey postcard.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - Morrissey postcard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead girls, 1980.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead girls, 1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Ridgers - When We Were Young.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Amateurs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Amateurs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Affable Familiar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:50 Hats That Changed The World.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:50 Hats That Changed The World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:John Higgs.jpg

Hello, Affable Familiar. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:John Higgs.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soft Cell cover Bedsittier.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Richard Norris (musician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Verve, Saint Etienne, Shakespeare's Sister and Moog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Affable Familiar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Affable Familiar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Women and Their Gardens cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (hardback).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Potted History book cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (revised).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (paperback).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rose (book) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rose (book), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 19:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worst Fashions cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rose cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Keeping Up Appearances (book)

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (paperback).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (paperback).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (revised).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keeping Up Appearances cover (revised).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Worst Fashions cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worst Fashions cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose (book) (November 25)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Rose (book)|cv=no|reason=nn|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=Please add some reviews of the book if possible. Currently it does not pass [[WP:GNG].|sig=yes}}

Hello, Affable Familiar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rose cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rose cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tot Taylor) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tot Taylor.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

IMDb and Amazon pages are not reliable sources. Similarly, iTunes and other music databases are inferior to coverage in secondary sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rose (book)

Hello, Affable Familiar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tot Taylor photo by Peter Ashworth.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tot Taylor photo by Peter Ashworth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Danny Flynn sepia III.jpg

The file File:Danny Flynn sepia III.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused edit of File:Danny Flynn sepia IIII.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Michelle Olley at Cosmic Trigger.jpg

Hello, Affable Familiar. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Michelle Olley at Cosmic Trigger.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Danny Flynn sepia IIII.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Danny Flynn sepia IIII.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:House Of Flora - hat wig.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:House Of Flora - hat wig.JPG, which you've attributed to Flora McLean/House Of Flora. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn 1.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn - snow 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn - snow 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn b.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn - snow 4.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn - snow 4.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn - snow 3.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn - snow 3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn - snow 1.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn - snow 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny Flynn - ink 1.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny Flynn - ink 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]