Jump to content

User talk:Aervanath/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deleted Page

[edit]

Hi, I have Created a page titled 16 Symbols. I ma not able to find it now. Can you please Search it? and provide me the link?

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.122.83 (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prajyot mahajan

[edit]

Hi, 

 Myself Fredrick Ellifsen  i am the manager of Prajyot mahajan.
The page Prajyot Mahajan is not unambiguously promotional also it is not an autobiography,
it is a user page made by myself and i made this page with the name of my artist prajyot mahajan ,
because... the people in india must know about the biography of artist prajyot mahajan.

He is an musician and we have legal information :

1. official facebook fan page account i.e '''www.facebook.com/mahajan.prajyot''' 2. official website i.e '''www.prajyotmahajan.in''' 3. twitter account '''www.twitter.com/prajyotmahajan''' 4. Reverbnation '''www.reverbnation.com/prajyotmahajan'''

also refer news articles page :

'''http://www.deshdoot.com/detail_archive_news.php?type=region&id=4318241&region=Deshdoot Times&month=5&year=2014&cid='''

We are not at all promoting any bussiness, its just we are helping this artist to get on internet, as people look on internet for finding information and history about prajyot mahajan

Please do look after it and cancel the page deletion. either you people make the Profile, i will provide the matter or let me do the same.

Contact Email id : mahajan.prajyot2@gmail.com

Regards, Fredrick Ellifsen — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredrickEllifsen (talk • contribs) 02:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore the above - page deleted as hoax, user blocked. JohnCD (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This redirect is an implausible typo and there are no incoming links

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SD0001 (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recover Deleted Submission

[edit]

Hi, Would you be able to recover the most recent edits done on the Nurse Next Door page but were taken down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nursenextdoor (talk • contribs) 00:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Gabriel Brown (actor)

[edit]

Brownray8309 (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Hello, Mr. Aervanath. Is there any way to un-delete the "Gabriel Brown (actor)" page that was created on 08:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)? Valley2city deleted it on 02:45, 2 April 2015, and I don't have a copy. Thanks! Brownray8309 (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

[edit]

Welcome back to Wikipedia. I hope you get your admin bit back without any hitches, we need more experienced admins such as yourself. Chillum 13:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words. I look forward to contributing again!--Aervanath (talk) 23:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bad close on archive navigation templates discussion

[edit]
  • The result of the discussion was Keep all While there is considerable support to merge these templates, the consensus seems to be that it would hinder more than it would help.--Aervanath (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

While I obviously have a stake in the matter, this simplistic assessment of the debate is terrible. There was significant disagreement on the matter, and you should have not declared it as anything stronger than "no consensus to merge".  — Scott • talk 10:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scott, why don't you take it to a second DRV? So that the cycle of close as keep → harass the closer → DRV → reopen → ... can continue for eternity.
Or WP:STICK. Fleet Command (talk) 05:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Scott:: After having read through the discussion again, I do not see any reason to change my conclusion. While there was vocal disagreement, I feel that the discussion was conclusive enough to establish consensus. If you are not satisfied, I generally take no offense at having my decisions appealed to WP:DRV.--Aervanath (talk) 21:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Levant

[edit]

I saw you closed the discussion at Talk:Levant#Location_of_State_of_Palestine and then undid your edit. Why? I thought it was a good idea, actually. Debresser (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Debresser::Well, I came upon the discussion through a request for closure at WP:ANRFC, now archived at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure/Archive_19#Requests_for_closure_on_Palestine-related_discussions and the section following it. There were actually two discussions requested for closure on 19 October and one discussion requested on 26 October. So by the time I got there, the discussions had all been dead for two weeks or more. I initially closed the first one just as a matter of form, but once I started delving into the other two, I realized that consensus seemed to have been achieved already, and all the participants seemed to have moved on. In that situation, there's really no point to a formal closure, so I just left those two the way they were, and went back and reversed my first closure for consistency's sake. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If there's genuine dispute about the outcome of the discussion, then I or another uninvolved editor can come in and assess consensus across the various discussions. But frankly it seems unnecessary. Cheers, --Aervanath (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is one stubborn editor. He could use the "official" closure. Or in other words, the other editors could use the "official" closure, to prevent that stubborn editor from casting doubt on the outcome. Debresser (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New DOB proposal

[edit]

If you wish, please join in. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 🖖 23:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discover Babylon page

[edit]

Hi there!

I created this page and you deleted it. You had good reason. I copied it word for word from my website, so you thought that I plagerized it. I cannot re-write it in my own words, because it was written by the ancient history experts who designed the game, Discover Babylon. (I am kind of just now getting back into Wikipedia. I love it, but never quite figured it out!) https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Discover_Babylon&action=edit&redlink=1

I am the copyright holder for the page http://fas.org/babylon. The Discover Babylon game and website was developed by the Learning Technologies Program at the Federation of American Scientists. I was the Director of this program from 2010 though 2013. The program was discontinued by the Federation of American Scientists and I was given permission to continue the Learning Technologies Program on my own. I started a for profit company, Molecular Jig Games and I now provide Discover Babylon information and free download at my site. (http://www.MolecularJig.com) As soon as I arrange it, DiscoverBabylon.org will forward to my site.

I hope this explanation works.

Komischewise (talk) 02:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Komischeweise MolecularJig@gmail.com Melanie Stegman[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Al Kerth

[edit]

On 24 October 2015, you indicated that you'd seen sources on Google that could help flesh out the Al Kerth article and demonstrate his notability. Please could you find those reliable sources with significan coverage and add them to the article? Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive behavior

[edit]

Hi, there - can you please look at User:Spreadofknowledge's behavior on my Talk page? I don't know how he writes without signing, first of all, which is bad faith. Furthermore, his behavior is brazenly disruptive, I believe. Thank you. Best, Castncoot (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Castncoot: I have warned him on his talk page about his behavior. If the behavior continues, please post to WP:AN to request further administrator intervention. That will usually get a faster response. Cheers,--Aervanath (talk) 14:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will do, thank you. Best, Castncoot (talk) 01:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

[edit]

Hello, Aervanath. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

[edit]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

[edit]

Hi Aervanath.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Aervanath. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Suicide response

[edit]

Template:Suicide response has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why Wikipedia Is Not So Great

[edit]

Hello. You deleted "Why Wikipedia Is Not So Great" as a redirect to a project essay. I want to re-create the page as a redirect to "Criticism of Wikipedia". Is it acceptable? --George Ho (talk) 07:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fine.--Aervanath (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
  • Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
  • A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete vs Speedy Delete

[edit]

"Speedy delete" was deleted per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 16. However, "Speedy Delete" (title cased) has been nominated for discussion; the result has been "kept". Would you undelete "Speedy delete" and then redirect it to Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion? --George Ho (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Aervanath (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two more redirects

[edit]

Thank you for undeleting speedy delete. Now... what about Meaning of the word "is" is and The definition of "is" is? The Definition of "is" is and Meaning of the word 'is' is were created in 2015. May you undelete those redirects to reflect that? Or may they be re-created as redirect to copula (linguistics)? --George Ho (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

added TheDJ
removed Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Meaning of the word "is" is

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Meaning of the word "is" is. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. George Ho (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

added Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
removed Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22 • Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking

[edit]
File:Pictures of bas reliefs with Hebrew.jpg

for someone to translate what I believe to be Hebrew on a frame around a bas relief (actually two) and I think your user page suggest to you can do it. Are you interested? Can I send you the pictures? Do you need the background story? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Carptrash:, I'm willing to give it a shot; if I can't translate it I'll be able to find someone who can.--Aervanath (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the two panels, crammed into one picture. Years after they were installed someone decided to add an awning to the entrance and in their wisdom encroached on the reliefs, oh well. I think the images represent David & Ruth - since the David is more or less a knockoff of Michaelangelo's David. Who knows where Ruth came from. They're on on the Jewish Community Center in Detroit and are the work of Corrado Parducci. Anyway, thanks for taking a look. Carptrash (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The two frames are two separate quotes from the Bible, both of which are sung as Jewish hymns. The one on the left is Hine Ma Tov, which is the opening of Psalm 133, and is sung across most Jewish traditions. The one on the right is Oz V'Hadar, which is Proverbs 31:25-26. As a hymn it is not widely sung to my knowledge, mainly popular with Hasidic Judaism as far as I know. (YouTube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjXrO0KlEbw) I've added the bits which are obscured, although I suspect the right-hand frame is somewhat abbreviated, since it doesn't seem like there's enough room to fit the entire missing chunk of the quote. Anyway, here are the translations; I've gone with the standard Biblical translations, since Biblical Hebrew is very different than the Modern Hebrew I speak.

On the left frame:

  • along the top: הנה מה טוב "Behold how good"
  • continuing down the left side: ומה נעים "and how pleasant"
  • not visible: שבת אחים "for brothers to dwell"
  • visible along the bottom: גם יחד "together in unity"

On the right frame:

  • along the top: עוז והדר לבושה "In strength and dignity she is clothed"
  • not visible: ותשחק ליום אחרון פיה פתחה בחכמה "and she shall rejoice in the time to come; her mouth opens in wisdom"
  • down the right side: ותורת חסד "and the teaching of kindness"
  • across the bottom: על לשונה "is on her tongue"

Hope this is what you needed. :) --Aervanath (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added Nakon • Scott
removed Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G7?

[edit]

I agree to our talk page being deleted a fourth time, but don't think G7 applies: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. It's not even clear who the author is. As a project talk page, it had many authors when it was deleted last year. I took care not to recreate it, instead sent some statistical information directly to an archive. Francis Schonken moved it, but is not the author, and then requested deletion. How is that G7? - Other questions: What can the project do to prevent users who are no members moving project pages? The talk page was archived before it was deleted, - how can these archives be tagged "of a deleted page" without losing a sense of history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

[edit]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discussion about Per-user page blocking

[edit]

Hi there,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input about building User Page (or category) blocking feature.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you voted or commented in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey about Enhanced per-user / per-article protection / blocking.

You can leave comments on this discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 23:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aervanath/Archive_17&oldid=1144155203"