User talk:Aelahmann3333360

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23034 was submitted on Oct 25, 2018 04:53:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I won't vandalize Wikipedia again, and I will revert my current vandalism. Widr, could you please unlock me? Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your vandalism already has been reverted. I don't see any useful contributions here. To consider an unblock we'd need to know what we can expect from you once unblocked. Please be at least somewhat specific; vague generalities won't be enough. Huon (talk) 20:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't revert vandalism on California State Route 163 yet. I want to and will revert it. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"vague generalities won't be enough". Declined. Yamla (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't revert vandalism on California State Route 163 yet. I want to and will revert it. I PROMISE. I reverted Cabrillo Freeway to Cabrillo Highway. I am reverting it back. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are still not stating what useful contributions you want to make, which has to be more than reverting your own vandalism(which has already been done anyway). Until you do this, you will not be unblocked, and if you continue to not address that point, your ability to edit this page will be removed. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't revert vandalism on California State Route 163 yet. I want to and will revert it. And I will have useful contributions. For example, I will move pages that are named wrong. And my contributions will be better than reverting vandalism. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 20:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aelahmann3333360 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely by Widr for vandalism. I said I was going to revert my current vandalism that has not been reverted yet. I didn't revert vandalism on California State Route 163 yet. I want to and will revert it. At that time the block will no longer be approrpiate. And I will have useful contributions. For example, I will move pages that are named wrong. And my contributions will be better than reverting vandalism. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A glance at your filter log makes your intentions obvious. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked. You are either trolling or aren't listening and lack sufficient competence to edit here. Any admin is free to restore your talk page access if they see fit. --Yamla (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restore TPA? Really? Concur with TPA removal and rationale. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]