User talk:Advokat2024

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander Lindemann

Hello Advokat2024,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alexander Lindemann for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Alexander Lindemann to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @InterstellarGamer12321, the page content has been deleted in seconds after your intervention so I was effectively not able to contest or ask anything.

Could you explain what was so wrong and how a valid redirect would look like? Thanks. Advokat2024 (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Advokat2024: redirects are not allowed to redirect from the main namespace (where finished articles are) to draftspace, where the target of your redirect was pointing towards. Redirects which do this are eligible for speedy deletion per the WP:R2 tag, which is why it was deleted quickly. To make a valid redirect, first wait for the draft to be accepted and moved to mainspace by a WP:AFC reviewer. Then make whatever redirects are necessary. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Lindemann (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Lindemann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Advokat2024! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]