User talk:AdventurousMe

Welcome!

Hello, AdventurousMe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Reference Errors on 29 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2013 Carlton Cannes heist page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fixed, thank you. Not sure if I should reply to a bot, but I have. It was a missing capital. AdventurousMe (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Leffel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Leffel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Leffel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can't vote twice in an AfD

You !voted twice at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Leffel, which is prohibited. Please refractor one of them into a comment. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY!!!!!! Thanks. Refracted the second one, which seems fair. AdventurousMe (talk) 03:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Hi, I want to ask you a question, out of the discussion about TL. Look at this article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jean_Anderson_%28cookbook_author%29. Why it has a template since 2007 and no one even started a delete query as it happened in the case of TL? It is a matter of luck? Otherwise, I do not understand how they can be more than 200 articles for travel writers.--Ane wiki (talk) 03:56, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article you've shown me looks prima facie notable as a food writer: she's got a Pulitzer scholarship, she's got a long list of books, published by big publishers (not self-published!), awards that are recognisable (book awards, not article awards), and a career history that includes editing big, well-known publications, and working as a columnist (not an occasional contributor) for well-known publications. Lots of the sources are primary, but I don't think it'd be hard to find reliable secondary sources for the article. She was marked as a stub, because there was more info to be found, and that was removed in 2013, and I'm guessing she's in the travel writers category as well as food because she has also written on travel. I don't see any reason why someone with those credentials would come up for deletion, TBH, though I can imagine there are people with similar credentials that aren't on Wiki. But, yes, per TL, what comes up for deletion tends to be a matter of luck: my guess would be that out of the 200-odd pages in the category American Travel Writers, all the dead ones are notable, and only a percentage of the living ones are (some may be notable people in other fields who are also tagged as travel writers because they've written a travel book in addition to being (eg) a mountaineer or explorer). I do feel for your predicament here. There are a tonne of people who write their own Wikipedia bios, or get friends/colleagues to do it, edit them blithely for year after year and never come up for deletion. That doesn't mean they aren't candidates for deletion. It means no one's got to them yet. The other problem is that when you have people, like TL, who edit their own page etc, they then kick up a complete stink when it comes to getting the page deleted, so no one really has the time to get to other pages that are equally deserving candidates. AdventurousMe (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Jill Heinerth was accepted

Jill Heinerth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 16:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jill Heinerth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks bot. AdventurousMe (talk) 09:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holly Weber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2014 (UTC) fixed AdventurousMe (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Howell

I appreciate the copyvio work you did. Let me know if there continues to be copyvio/deletion activity following. It's a short article on a suddenly much more notable subject [see viral youtube Humans Need Not Apply -- wiki won't allow direct link] and no longer a copyvio imo. --Nemonoman (talk) 18:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, [User:Nemonoman|Nemonoman]] - much appreciated! It looks like a fairly uncontroversial keep now - I'd be amazed if an admin deleted it. But I'll keep an eye on the discussion and if people do challenge it further. I don't think it's a copyvio any longer either, but I'm not sure I've moved it far enough along to personally remove the copyvio tag - if you feel like removing it, though, as a different editor, I think that would be fair and within bounds... Also, if it's now notable, hopefully others with more expertise will come along and improve it. AdventurousMe (talk) 03:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Wheeler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tony Wheeler may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in 1980, the publication of a guidebook to India effectively doubled the size of the company.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/managing/blogs/enterprise/turn-your-business-into-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bradfords Group

I noticed your interest in the discussion of the deletion of the entry for the Bradfords Group. Interestingly, the majority of content and the argument to retain this thinly-veiled advertisement is Richard Poole, a professional marketeer (Richard Poole Associates) and one-time colleague of CEO Mark Eburne from their time together at Wolseley UK PLC. HE seemed to duck your direct question about relationship to the subject matter - I wonder why...86.167.199.186 (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I don't doubt you in the slightest - it seemed obvious to me that he had a conflict of interest. What I'd propose you do is create an account, and then flag the page for COI editing, providing details on the talk page. I'll add the page to my watch list and keep an eye on what transpires... AdventurousMe (talk) 10:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am still bemused by how you have deleted what was a great source of researched history about a really interesting family business. It's a story that should be communicated out to the world, rather than censuring it for reasons that are beyond me? Please tell me, how do these following (similar) pages stay unchallenged when the Bradfords one does not? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Travis_Perkins https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Buildbase https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Poundland

I think more encouragement is required rather than attitude that is currently taken. Contributing to Wikipedia should be an enjoyable process for the many, not just the few? Richardrpoole (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest you review the Wikipedia guidlines on Conflict of Interest editing? Generally, Wikipedia editors don't like conflict of interest editing, which is probably why you had a hard time, particularly since you seem to have concealed that COI in the AFD debate. If you can find solid sources for the unsourced material which has been removed, please do set up a paragraph on the talk page with a list of facts and sources that other editors can then add in. I'll take a look at the three pages you cite: probably the reason they've not been challenged is that nobody's looked at them. As you and I well know, there are a myriad family-owned businesses in the UK that stretch back centuries, because it's an old country. That doesn't mean they pass Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. AdventurousMe (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the links. The Poundland one looks way too long and has some obvious POV issues - but it is a notable business that deserves a WP entry, as is Travis Perkins: both are big companies and have a lot of coverage in serious media. Less sure about Buildbase, which seems weak on sources, and may not meet general notability guidelines. I'll take a proper look at it later. Thanks. AdventurousMe (talk) 06:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bradfords Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thorney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

Hello why did you delete controversy? [1] It was in investigation report. Controversy heading should have conclusion of report. You did not explain :( ---TheSawTooth (talk) 21:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cut it back because it was way too long and most of the information was irrelevant. You could amend, if you wished, to add "although in one instance investigators found that it was the client's responsibility to delete the data not ERA's." You'll then need to look at the description of what ERA does, which currently implies that part of their job for all clients is to securely wipe data, although this investigation found that in this instance it wasn't. Good luck - and do try and keep it short! AdventurousMe (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok please try to keep the data safe. I am making amend. Thank you. ---TheSawTooth (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ERA advert tag

[2] They have put advert tag on page did we write it like advert? You corrected everything I did. How can advert tag have consensus? ---TheSawTooth (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been on Wiki for a while - super-busy over Christmas. Let me take a look. There's other things that I would have taken out.... AdventurousMe (talk) 13:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for taking time from your Christmas activity. It is deleted or kept is concern of AFD editors but I am really disagreed on nikthestunned one line revision and new advert promo tag. ---TheSawTooth (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry MacElhone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Lady. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey Dickens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Beard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch

Sorry I didn't mean to revert your edit without explanation - 5th deadliest disaster yes, third deadliest natural disaster yes. I don't really care which. I even suspect it would be best not there at all. Andrewgprout (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Ah, sorry, I should have checked better, so no worries about reverting the edit. I agree it would be better to lose it as the various sources seem to differ. AdventurousMe (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AdventurousMe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Setia Darma House of Masks and Puppets

Hello, AdventurousMe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Setia Darma House of Masks and Puppets, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Will Meyrick

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Will Meyrick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 03:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. It appears someone else has tidied up the references and removed the tag, since otherwise I would have contested the nomination: he clearly meets General Notability Guidelines. AdventurousMe (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ryan Chetiyawardana) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ryan Chetiyawardana, AdventurousMe!

Wikipedia editor Ajpolino just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please expand this article with information from the sources cited. Also note the orphan tag on the page. Are there any other articles that might reasonably link to this one?

To reply, leave a comment on Ajpolino's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ajpolino (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AdventurousMe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AdventurousMe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AdventurousMe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Chetiyawardana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryan Chetiyawardana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]