User talk:Adneicah
Issues at St George Christian School
[edit]Issue 1: I am getting annoyed with the unfair management and don't know what to do. Issue 2: The management from that school are always putting propaganda in the local newspaper. Also I think Loopla is in cahootz with honor. Can you please block Loopla.
Regards, --Adneicah 06:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- The management at the school has nothing to do with Wikipedia, and information about them doesn't belong here without a reliable source.
- There's been nothing unfair about the way things have gone for you, and nobody is in "cahootz" with anybody. The information you added was unsourced and correctly removed. The continued personal attacks rightfully earned you an indefinite block.
- Wikipedia is not your soapbox. --Onorem♠Dil 11:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: issues at St George Christian School (a little message for my mate Onorem)
[edit]FYI, the management at SGCS has a lot to do with Wikipedia (Honor says it himself), various large donations to the site, and articles in the newsletter talking about the school's connections with Wiki., is true.
2): The school's management has been v. unfair to me because 1: I am Japanese/Thai, 2: I have not given the school a large sum of money for a donation, 3:My english skills are not 100%.
Onorem, the next time you want to smear and tease my problems and troubles, please do it not on Wikipedia. And again, stop being a racist homosexual bitch.
P.S.: I wasn't talking about the info on the SGCS article, stupid! How can you say that things weren't unfair, when you don't even know what is going on? I'll give you a soapbox!
Piss off, --Adneicah 08:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC), from Adanensne
- My apologies for assuming the message you had left on my talk page had to do with how you were being treated in regards to the SGCS article. I can't do anything, and frankly don't care, about your off-wiki issues.
- Whatever connections the school supposedly has with Wikipedia wouldn't matter if you could provide a reliable source for the things you want to add. Their supposed donations don't provide them any editorial oversight for the article.
- I never smeared or teased you about any of your problems or troubles. I'm not exactly sure why you think that I did.
- The continuous personal attacks and accusations you make towards everyone you come into contact with here will not help you in any way. If you decide to evade your block again, please try to be more civil next time. --Onorem♠Dil 12:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
More messages for Onorem
[edit]Well, if you don't care about my issues, why are you making such a fuss by being racist against my race then?
You say their donations don't get them any editorial oversight, you bet they do!, every thing they do is for their personal benifit. Some people on wiki (eg: loopla) get paid good amounts of AU$$ to edit things in their favor.
I think that you are teasing my problems because you don't give a rats ass about the corruption that is going on this site, all people are supposed to love and care the wiki way. Do you support people getting persucuted because thay are supporting the right thing?
I know people who are admin. on this site and I will suggest that you get blocked of you keep this up.
P.S.: I an not evading my block, I am being cleaver (again)!
Abuahai, --Adneicah 13:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)