User talk:Adityabill2001
Welcome
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bowbazaar Bomb Blast 1993 has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~ Amkgp 💬 18:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport
[edit]i have reverted your edit in Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport since the previous photo is suitable for infobox. I have added your photo in below, in the here. ❯❯❯ S A H A 08:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.
— Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 18:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ❯❯❯ S A H A 05:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.A week after your block, your back to reverting other's edits on Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport. Bingobro (Chat) 10:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Prolix 💬 05:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport. Prolix 💬 08:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, remember that discussion we had on my talk page and we settled for a calm minded , no revert/edit warring stance? Well looks like forgot about it, anyways I'd like to clarify that the AI flight to LHR is not a scheduled commercial service its an evacuation flight ,meant to bring back Indians from The UK and take the Brits in Kolkata back. Kindly do not re-add the flight unless AI decides to file a schedule for it and make it permanent (which as of now is unlikely). Thank you! Bingobro (Chat) 05:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're really stretching limits here aren't you?, I was closing that discussion when you had to make this pointless and slightly disrespectful edit [1]. Bingobro (Chat) 08:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Temperament and name call isues of Adityabill2001. The discussion is about the topic Kolkata Airport. Thank you. Bingobro (Chat) 08:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User talk:Prolix—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 17:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2002 attack on American cultural centre in Kolkata into Consulate General of the United States, Kolkata. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit] Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 06:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Another editor nominated this for deletion on the grounds that it was redundant to Draft:Pramod Pathak.
The pages are about the same topic, but they are substantially different, so I removed the speedy-deletion template.
I put an explanation at Draft talk:Pramod Pathak (2).
I realize you are blocked and will likely remain so for some time to come (WP:Standard offer requires 6 months being away from Wikipedia before you even ask for reinstatement - this means NO editing of the English Wikipedia except for polite discussions related to your block on this page at all, whether logged in or not). By that time, both drafts will be "speedy deleted" as "stale drafts" under criteria WP:CSD#G13.
When you come back, ask yourself "is this person notable?" If he is, consider going to WP:REFUND and asking that both pages be restored so you can merge them.
To talk page stalkers: If you can look into this person and help determine if he meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, please do. If he does, please pick one of the pages to improve and submit it through articles for creation. If the person does not, please put a note on the talk pages of both saying so, so others won't waste time. Also put a note on this talk page so Adityabill2001 won't waste time if and when they are unblocked.
By they way, you are only blocked on the English Wikipedia, you still have editing privileges on other Wikipedias and other Wikimedia projects such as the Commons. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Pramod Pathak (2)
[edit] Hello, Adityabill2001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pramod Pathak (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Pramod Pathak (2)
[edit]
Hello, Adityabill2001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pramod Pathak".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)