User talk:Aditya Mani Tripathi

Welcome

Hello, Aditya Mani Tripathi, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Aditya Mani Tripathi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Aditya Mani Tripathi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi

Hello, Aditya Mani Tripathi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He may indeed be Notable, but the sourcing doesn't show this. You have:

Two maps (Sources 1 and 2) which just show places;
Two mentions (Sources 3 and 5) that just show he stood in elections;
One (Source 6) that doesn't appear to be relevant;
One (Source 4) that doesn't work.

None of the sources are inline, so you can't see what content they are supposed to support.

The tone is promotional and personal, e.g. "remembered for his kind behaviour".

I'm assuming you have a connection which needs to be declared as a conflict of interest.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 08:32, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further advice

Hi - I'm going to try to clearly set out what you need to do to get your draft accepted. But you'll need to read and follow the advice.

Notability - he probably meets this, as a politician elected to a state government. So you need to find at least two reliable sources that show this. This one works, [1], but it only shows that he lost. Can you find another that shows when he won?
Citations - then, you need to put the source against the fact it supports. So, if you're saying he lost in 1977, you put that source at the end of the sentence that says it. And when you say he won in 1989, you put the source that shows that at the end of the sentence. Look at the first paragraph of the Early life section of Indira Gandhi and you'll see what I mean.
Unsupported material - then, you need to take out anything that isn't supported by a reliable source. So, when you say, "Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi was the youngest block pramukh of faizabad he was elected block president at a age of 29 yrs", you either need to find a source that shows this, and put it in at the end of the line, or you need to take it out.
Neutral point of view - Wikipedia doesn't have articles that praise people, or that condemn them. We write about them in a Neutral way. So, you need to take out anything that isn't neutral, like "he is still remembered for his kind behaviour and for his work done for the public". Unless you've got a reliable source saying that, it's just your opinion.
Conflict of interest - lastly, are you connected to the Dr.? I see you share a name. Is he a relative? If he is, you need to declare this and you may not be the best person to write about him.
More details - You can find more details in the guidance we suggested earlier, like Help:Referencing for beginners.

I hope this helps. But you do need to put some effort in, read the guidance, follow the advice given and try and apply this to your draft. KJP1 (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to Faizabad appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 11:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faizabad. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Caution for repeated attempts to promote a non-notable individual on multiple articles. See also obviously related Special:Contributions/Iwikireviewer. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 11:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attempt to add the title "Dr." to an article's name. Wikipedia article naming conventions exclude honorifics such as Dr., President, Guru and Rev. from the names of articles. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi has been accepted

Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

→== Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi ==

Seeing how much of a hassle it was to get the article to an even marginal pass at AfD, I would ask you to not compound that by removing cleanup tags before the issues are addressed! This is disruptive, and you are fooling nobody by editing logged out. If you don't stop this, the article is likely going to be semi-protected and you may be blocked from editing for a time. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let me be more clear. The next time you remove those tags without improving the sources and/or reducing the adulatory fluff in the text, I will suggest to have you blocked for a time for disruptive editing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Know I have given the reference you can see in 1996 he fought from BJP and in 1989 he won against Mitrasen Yadav

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also stop removing maintenance templates, leave it to others to assess if the peacockery/promotion etc is gone or not. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aditya Mani Tripathi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir one user adamstewart99 is continuously editing it and giving bad violation against me. He is doing it personally please stop him

Uh, no. What you mean is he is removing the promotional language and peacock terms you wrote in the article. Sorry, no. I think you have too close a connection to the subject to edit neutrally. Please read up on conflict of interest. Cheers, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock/meat puppetry to increase disruption while not getting your way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Spaceman[[User talk:SpacemanSpiff|Spiff]] 14:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aditya Mani Tripathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked as the user Adam was continuously Editing my article I am having all reliable references . But he was again and again editing only personaly he said I will be editing continuously do what you can do . I said I will talk with authorities but until he talked with friend editors and blocked me. Give me one chance I have all references and I will clearyfy it. Aditya Mani Tripathi 18:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were blocked for your violations of WP:SOCK but haven't addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can see in article that Adam is using the prominent persons surname directly he is showing no respect he wrote Tripathi won  the election. But his name is dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi. He is dead but Adam is showing no respect and making article bad please take some action

Aditya Mani Tripathi 18:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admin: FYI three CU-confirmed socks of theirs have been blocked so far (see Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Aditya Mani Tripathi ), so it's not just a case of disruptive editing... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 03:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pity, but not unexpected. You never did answer my question about your connection, which there clearly is. If you want this to work you really need to understand that Wikipedia's articles aren't tributes and they're not the first author's property either. KJP1 (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aditya Mani Tripathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[Dear sir, I am not in his relative I live near his village I am a responsible citizen of milkipur . And sir I am sorry for sockpupets because he was continuously editing the article and I was having reliable sources too . And please unblock me I have seen that I have been blocked indefinitely please stop I am sorry and i will not use any other hatred].

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Crocodile tears, shed just minutes after yet another sock of theirs has been spotted: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aditya Mani Tripathi. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you again try to convert this page to an article or for any purpose other than posting an unblock request then your talk page access will also be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 08:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aditya Mani Tripathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

[I AM SORRY give me last chance]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Try WP:Standard Offer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment, this is getting very interesting if not entertaining, this request comes minutes after one of their socks' talk page access is also revoked ... see User talk:Aloknath yadav ---Adamstraw99 (talk) 13:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop and walk away

Aditya Mani Tripathi - Just stop. You are making yourself look foolish and you are wrecking any chance you may still have of being accepted back here. Just walk away and come back when you can view the situation objectively. KJP1 (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]