User talk:AdityaDas02

This is AdityaDas02's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As written, this appears to constitute original research and this is not the purpose of Wikipedia.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AdityaDas02! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scale Analysis of Stokes Flow in 2D Periodic Channels of Arbitrary Geometry (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scale Analysis of Stokes Flow in 2D Periodic Channels of Arbitrary Geometry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks like you are trying to publish an original research paper. That is not what Wikipedia is for, we collect information that has already been published and established by reliable sources. Instead, I would recommend you try instead to submit your paper to a research journal if you are looking for publication, or are interested in something more open access like Wikipedia, consider arXiv. —Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]