User talk:Adidas

Welcome!

Hello, Adidas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 5 July 2005 16:38 (UTC)

Gone in Sixty seconds.

ITV cancelled a broadcast of the film The X Files at midnight on 9 July, which featured an explosion at a Federal building caused by a bomb. Another film, Stakeout, was shown instead. The following evening, the terrorism-themed action film The Siege, originally scheduled for a 10:15pm broadcast on BBC One, was replaced by Gone in Sixty Seconds.

And the answer (I think) is that "Gone in Sixty seconds" is the 2000 version "Gone in 60 seconds" is the earliuer one Rich Farmbrough 08:00, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see... thanks for that. I didn't know what that blurb refered to on the london page. Thanks for clarifying it. Adidas 09:17, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ColdFusion

I did not spam the page. If you bothered to look at the links forst you would have seen that one was for the CF-Talk list which is a major resource for the community. Another was for the CF-Community list which is also a massive mailing list, but in retrospect might not have belonged. Another was for Fusion Authority which is a web-zine, again a ColdFusion resource.

How about next time trying to talk to me rather than accusing me of spam.

Michael Salla

You may recall posting a comment on Michael Salla, the exopolitics guy who figures there's a massive conspiracy regarding alien visitation. I just nominated it for deletion and feel free to second the motion if you like. His academic record is actually quite impressive but re-reading the page I couldn't help but feel it's publicity for his website and kooky ideas. The first comment in talk says he "approved" the page but I have a feeling he may actually have written it himself or, at least, that it was posted by an uncritical admirer. Take care Marskell 10:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers and done :) Adidas 20:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Thanks for your clear-eyed constructive criticism of the Adoption and International Adoption of Korean Children articles. I think you're on track. I'm exceedingly difficult to persuade - some might even say stubborn, bull-headed, or headstrong. I appreciate your kindhearted, yet firm arguments. You are an asset to the WP. Danlovejoy 14:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dan, so are you. :) Adidas 14:48, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]