User talk:Adeikov

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Adeikov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Venus Project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jncraton (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Venus Project

You are adding a lot of things, and that is good, but unfortunately I have to say that most of what you add are of extremely poor quality and it will have to be removed, although I don't think I will have the time this weekend. At this point I would ask you to not make additions to the article without discussing them on the talk page first, because we really can't have all these unreferenced. POV, speculations and WP:Original research in the article. It doesn't matter that most of what you write, as calling RBE communism, is fundamentally correct. We have to have a WP:Reliable source saying so, or we can't add it in the article.

Thanks. --OpenFuture (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review the material added myself, after studying the original research criterion and neutral pov criterion better, I will rectify the issues, and ensure conformance. I knew not all of it was perfect and would require alteration later, my motive here was structured flow and better clarity of the concept and critique Jacque Fresco discusses. Tell if my alterations are improvements, I know it's not perfect, I forsee a rewrite based on this structure, but better flow and cohesion and better conformance with Wikipedia. --Adeikov (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Titles

The title field of a source should contain the title of the source. Hence http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/04/the-resource-based-gift-economy/ 's title is "The Resource Based GIFT Economy" and nothing else. The title field is *not* a description. --OpenFuture (talk) 00:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford University Research Project on The Zeitgeist Movement

Dear Adeikov,

My name is James Beard and I am currently conducting research on The Zeitgeist Movement for my masters dissertation on the course Nature, Society & Environmental Policy at Oxford University.

I am particularly interested in how The Zeitgeist Movement represents itself and is represented by others on the internet, and how these representations match up to or run counter to its real world activities. My main interest is in the role of the internet and environmentalism/sustainability discourses in generating the globalist mindset of the movement's members.

As the leading editor of The Venus Project page, I was wondering if you might be willing to talk to me a bit about why you feel it is important that The Venus Project page contains the information that it does.

If you are willing to talk to me, please send me an email at james.beard [at] ouce.ox.ac.uk

Kind regards,

James Beard

J Beard 88 (talk) 08:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]