User talk:AddisonJudah

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AddisonJudah. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

May 2020

Hello, I'm KMagz04. I noticed that you recently removed content from Syktyvkar State University without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KMagz04 (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ANDY SMIIIIIII

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as ANDY SMIIIIIII, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CLCStudent (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AddisonJudah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK, I realise i was a big idiot. I was showing of to my mate through zoom and i got *VERY* carried away. usually, i try to be responsible, and i just want to say, even if i don't get unblocked, that i am sorry. I thought it was a big joke at the time, and now i realise i was just an idiot. If you unblock me, i *promise* i won't do anything again. if i do, then go ahead and completely IP ban me, because you'll have good reason. But just one more chance? -AddisonJudah AddisonJudah (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Furthermore, a) i didn't know the sandbox existed, otherwise i would've used that, and b) That edit on David Hunt; he HAS retired, i just can't confirm it. but on his instagram page, it says '16 years professional footballer.' if he started playing in 1999, then he retired in 2017. b) doesn't have much to do with my block, but i want to get this down here, just in case. AddisonJudah (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 11:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK. I am really sorry and i'll do everything you've said here. AddisonJudah (talk) 11:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

OK, i've found a site on the 42nd (East_Lancashire) Infantry Division, which was marked as a page needing a prose, and i've altered a small bit. I'll keep updating this here, as i need to balance this with schoolwork, over the course of the day. AddisonJudah (talk) 12:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

---

42nd (East Lancashire) Infantry Division

The 42nd (East Lancashire) Division then remained on the Western Front, and took part in phases of the First Battles of the Somme 1918, including The Battle of Bapaume, The First Battle of Arras and The Battle of the Ancre.

No. If you wish to be unblocked, follow the instructions you've given --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)