Jump to content

User talk:Adbouz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Adbouz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Álvaro of Córdoba (Mozarab). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Adbouz. Sorry to revert your additions to the "external links" sections on various articles pertaining to slavery; but in each case, the content of the blog offers Wikipedia articles as sources. Please see WP:EXTERNAL LINKS and WP:CIRCULAR. Thank you for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Saracen

[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have posted content to the Saracen article in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Adbouz (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)I commented only in English in the English Wikipedia page. In addition it is time to correct your articles so-called history while it is only propagandists who implement their policy[reply]

Soapbox posting on talk pages

[edit]

Hi, please review policies on what Wikipedia is not, in particular WP:SOAPBOX. Most of your recent edits – such as these: 1, 2, 3 – appear to be soapbox posts on talk pages aimed at promoting a personal point of view (as well as links to the same website), rather than suggestions about ways to improve articles based on reliable sources. Thank you, R Prazeres (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC) --Adbouz (talk) 06:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are in the insult without any embarrassment. It's not for me to prove something that doesn't exist. If you say that the Bedouins conquered territories, have an architecture etc, it is up to you to provide the sources. Not literature, but sources which prove that there is a Bedouin architecture in the Hijaz, that the latter really exported this knowledge to Spain. So far all Wikipedia articles on everything related to Islam are based on bad literature, without a single credible source. You want to make us swallow tales of the superstitious of the middle ages, but we are in the 21st century. We have websites that teach the real story — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adbouz (talkcontribs) DATE AND TIME (UTC)