User talk:Adarequiermentwiki

Adarequiermentwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Adarequiermentwiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from United States Access Board. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - You removed the tag but the article still has no sources. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you added to so many articles removed, as not germane to those articles. This has nothing to do with people being anti-ADA. In addition, you indicated your changes as as minor, when not. David notMD (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Adarequiermentwiki. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi, I made a comment on your main account's talk page about sockpuppetry; please take a look at it. I appreciate that you're trying to support a good cause (and the ADA is certainly one), but this is very much not the way to do it. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

im not a fraken sock puppet im just a person that is concerned with information about Americans with disability not existing on public entity pages

The timing was suspicious. You made an edit. It was reversed. A few minutes later Shadowoneone made the identical edit.David notMD (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adarequiermentwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im a disabled person that only wishes to upgrade and link to other paged in Wikipedia i do not know how to add references to pages. every one in the world will some times wright the same or invent the same thing in a given lifetime it happens. my fiend set up linx to refresh the web page i view if some one has eddited something on a webpage and i dont know how to change that settings he never expland how to disabled it so i click revert . i do not know who shadowoneone is. my brain is fryed from staying up giving information and linking pages so that other disabled people can understand the world. if im being treated this way than i do not feal that this is not a open living encyclopedia any more. when users or entitys remove content by censorship. my insomia has kicked in and what is cc by-sa and gdfl that just poped up

Decline reason:

There is technical evidence connecting the two accounts, and it's clear to me that both are operated by the same person. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ada for usa 06:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

You must not change the wording of your unblock request after it has been reviewed. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adarequiermentwiki, I noticed your attempted change to the declined unblock request. As David Biddulph says, you must not change a request once it has been declined, but need to make a new request instead. But before you do that, I'm puzzled by your comments about disability access. Wikipedia takes disability access very seriously, but I can't see how that is relevant to your block. You are blocked for the misuse of multiple accounts. You have denied operating the two accounts, but it is clear that the same person is behind the two accounts and the related IP address - and that is what you would need to address in any new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i did not do that i added what my minde works and you have finly pushed my self to do so you will never heard of me agin for this is my last will and testment you have pushed this disabled person and removed his acess to the internet at lagrge i will no go and hang my slef you have pushed me to this point