User talk:AdaletAdam
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, AdaletAdam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Talk:Turkish War of Independence does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anti-Turkish sentiment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Kevo327 (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not clear attributions from published Journals to bias your opinion. The material referenced was reliable and cited suitably. If there is a format problem please let me know, instead of deciding of helpfulness of the attribution from your perpective. Thank you ~~~ AdaletAdam (talk) 08:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Furthermore clearing a addressing point from your talk page just looks bad. AdaletAdam (talk) 08:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Anti-Turkish sentiment, you may be blocked from editing. - Kevo327 (talk) 09:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please indicate, where in that article there is a poorly sourced section. That definition of nationalism is published and backed by other academic sources. The contested post-truth section isn't favourable by general academia due certain intelligence efforts and was removed accordingly however remaining is factual and descriptive. Otherwise, you are breaching NPOV. I await your response immediately, otherwise you should be blocked from editing. AdaletAdam (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 09:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- {{re|Ks0stm}} Is this in reference to the edit "a crime" into "an event", I believe in context of the Armenian Genocide Denial topic event is more suitable as it is talking about the point of view of the deniers. However similarly it is suitable to use the clause "a crime" in the Armenian Genocide article. This seems to me more intellectually in neutral between two perspectives. AdaletAdam (talk) 10:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
AdaletAdam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am trying to engage with the editors of the pages and providing sources as necessary, however they are nor engaging with or further elaborating why the source is contested. I red through NPOV and disruptive edits, just because something isn't the mainstream opinion it doesn't have malicious intention behind it. I kindly requested my block is lifted. You are encouraged to visit the talk pages and notes for the edits I am making, these are not to pushing perspective to created a realistic understanding. Thank you for your time.
Decline reason:
I one of your requests below, you openly said that "this kind of censorship is nothing but racism". This alone tell me you have no idea why you were blocked, and would continue to edit in the way that caused the block to begin with. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AdaletAdam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I like to point out that I am judged by nationalistic propaganda whilist the editor who is requesting my block is Armenian that is editing the article of Anti-Turkism and refuses to state ASALA a terror organisation is anti-Turkish. I trust that the lack of intellectual honest is clear here.
Decline reason:
Duplicate request, will reply to first one. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AdaletAdam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This kind of censorship for willing to engage in arguments is nothing but racism. Ironically it is over Anti-Turkism. This is nothing but intellectually wrapped hate-speech. I kindly request that my block is lifted. I provide my sources as suitable and follow NPOV as suitable.
Decline reason:
Duplicate request, will reply to first request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)