User talk:Ad1970india

Welcome!

Hello, Ad1970india! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Deepak D'Souza 04:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gaunkars of Goa for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Deepak D'Souza 06:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 07:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ad1970india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I operate from my cousins (friends) computers during holidays.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason you were blocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 07:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ad1970india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

then buy me a PC and an internet connection--Ad1970india (talk) 07:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you don't have a right to edit here. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, this doesn't address why you were blocked. You were blocked because you appear to be the same person operating the other accounts listed here. No checkuser was conducted, so this is not based on technical evidence as you seem to believe, but rather behavioral evidence. If you are in fact different people, then it appears you are editing on the other's behalves, which is considered meatpuppetry and handled in the same matter. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 08:00, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ad1970india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is another wikipedia issue we got to take to jimmy, my brother just suggested

Decline reason:

If you are the same person, you are blocked. If you are his brother, but making the edits he wants made now that he is blocked, you are editing on behalf of a blocked user, and are blocked. I'm not sure which it is, but for the purposes of this block, it isn't relevant. Your brother is not allowed to edit Wikipedia, not even by asking you to edit on his behalf. If you are his brother, and independently carrying out the same edits that you know resulted in his block... you're blocked for that. Even if your brother doesn't understand, maybe you will understand that no amount of arguing on Wikipedia will have an effect on the United Nations and its decisions. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ad1970india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not acceptable! Don't relate my activity to his, if he is blocked, you may have a valid reason, what do I have to do with that? We are five and share two computers, and three more brothers/cousins are interested, can you stop them?. I happen to support him because I know he is right, besides I too have interest in editing 'Goa' on wikipedia. Many editors support each other, will you call all sock puppets? Give me valid reasons for my block.

Decline reason:

You have been given valid reasons, whether you like them or not. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ad1970india (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your accusations are not justified. I have no option but to operate from this computer and this internet connection, this is a shared arrangement, and I will be operating for long.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry you feel that way. But it's apparent that more unblock requests will not lead to anything productive, so I'm removing your ability to make further requests. Mango juice^talk 02:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Ad1970india (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]