User talk:ActiveTransport

December 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bilby (talk) 23:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ActiveTransport (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked without any evidence of abusing multiple accounts. I am indeed connected to Draft:Maestrano. But I dont't have any other account. I am a faithful editor trying to avoid conflict of interest. That's why I requested to review the Draft:Maestrano to an admin, not publishing it myself. But instead, the admin blocked me. Dear User:SwisterTwister, User:DGG, user:Jimfbleak please help me. I think you are good faith admins. I will follow all the rules of conflict of interest policy of Wikipedia. I will just propose edits on the talk page. Will not edit directly to the article if it is published. The company is notable. You can find lots of news coverage Here Thanks.

Decline reason:

After discussing with blocking admin, I am not convinced that you are not a sockpuppet. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

- ActiveTransport (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilby: Can you, please, clarify the situation? What other accounts have been used by this person? Vanjagenije (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanjagenije. User:Mamadoutadioukone was the master - a long running paid editing sock farm, with the original account indef blocked after an SPI. A Mamadoutadioukone account, User:Augustin1104, created the Maestrano article as an apparent paid job a few days back. ActiveTransport turned up shortly thereafter to recreate the article. - Bilby (talk) 14:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{Checkuser needed}}. Please, compare this account to Augustin1104 and Gogical. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In progress.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD: Are you already in the middle of this?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The three accounts appear to be Unrelated. However, their use of IPs is very suspicious.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by use of IPs? I am not using or editing from IPs. I am using this own account to edit. - ActiveTransport (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already said. I don't have any other account. Those are not my shockpuppet. Please somebody now review the draft. - ActiveTransport (talk) 03:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]