User talk:Across.The.Synapse
S'mores Image
[edit]You added this image with the {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} tag. I looked through the site a bit, but I didn't see anything about copyright. Can you point out the copyright information on the site? - JPM | 02:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I know, it has to explicitly say that it can be used for any purpose on the site in order to use that image tag. It's a nice pic, and I'd like to see it stay (got me a bit hungry, too). You might want to use this tag instead. But first check out some of the other images that are already using that tag to get an idea of some fair use rationale that could be used. - JPM | 07:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject Films Banner
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you placed a wikiproject boilerplate on The Blob article. Just so you know, these templates should only be placed on the article's talk page as per the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject. Cheers -Localzuk (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Copyright Problem with Raspberry Baked Alaska
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Raspberry-baked-alaska.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 23:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Wow
[edit]I want to thank you for pointing out that the Sun is ultimately the source of wind on the planet. I never even thought about it, but it makes sense, and that is so cool! Keep up the good work!!! ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 00:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
My Status Changer
[edit]I saw your edit to my status changer. If you want to use it, tell me. Thanks --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 23:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Status Changer
[edit]I will make you your own Status Changer. You don't have to use Merlinus's. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 00:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Status Changer
[edit]I created your status changer. To change your status click on the text that says, "Activity Level" (the text is black, but it is still a link) and edit the page that it links to. For help, ask me. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 00:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sweet. I appreciate this greatly.--Matthew 00:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you want me to make the link blue, tell me. The reason it's black is so people don't click it and change your status. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 02:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
LaRouche
[edit]LaRouche is absolutely crazy. He's been running for president since 1980 and taken almost every position under the sun. He clearly does have strong rhetorical skills, and some of his early work most likely is a demonstration of this. Unfortunately, he's used his exceptional powers of persuasion to lure his supporters into virtually worshiping him. LaRouche's movement is known to scour college campuses for ill adjusted students who they proceed to systematically brainwash and remove them from society. Past members describe how they were sucked into strings of lies. Ultimately they are pressured to drop out of college and cut all contacts with all friends and families and live collectively with other activists. All this sounds wacko, but it’s the truth and LaRouche should be considered to be very dangerous. The only reason that he continues to have any voice is that he consistently convinces his small community of supporters to donate vast sums of money to his presidential campaigns. In 2004 he successfully raised millions of dollars by convincing almost everyone that donated to him to give over 1000 dollars. These funds are then largely used in the printing and distribution of his propaganda materials.
While he is definitely crazy, his past theses on the powers of persuasion and on psychological topics should not be discredited wholesale alongside his political stances. He clearly has demonstrated that he knows what he's talking about when it comes to convincing people to believe you. And as for his economic theory, I'm not sure, but I have a feeling it should be treated as highly suspect as well.
On LaRouche
[edit]As far as someone 'telling you' whether LaRouche is bonkers or not, that's up to you to find out what the truth is. My job is to present you with what I know to be true in hopes that you can form a more developed hypothesis.
I do a lot of lobbying in Washington, DC for an organization associated with the Catholic Church. I've been reading his magazine, Executive Intelligence Review, for years now, had exchanges with his associates, and have even attended a few of his webcasts. You could probably consider me to be what Washingtonians call a 'Closet LaRouchie'.
Anyway, as far as I know, LaRouche is the most accurate economist in history when it comes to forecasting. Look into the man's record as far back as the 1950s. His forecasts have been right every time. According to some of my contacts on Capitol Hill, LaRouche is taken with varying degrees of seriousness by members of Congress. Some do indeed view him to be a complete nutjob, but I've also heard some Congressional staffers use the term, 'genius' repeatedly. A few members of Congress from both the House and the Senate have met with LaRouche himself plenty of times.
My humble view? I honestly think that the guy is legit. History is full of examples of men and women who are persecuted by popular opinion because they decided to get up and tell the truth.
As far as the conspiracy theory stuff, I don't know of the work you're referencing, but I'll check it out. He does have a tendency to make references in his writings to a lot of subjects that his audience is probably not very well educated on. However, I can say that I think it's extremely naive for someone to think that conspiracies don't exist. Most events in history are organized through a conspiracy, for better (i.e. the American Revolution) or worse. (i.e. the assassinations of JFK, RFK, Dr. King, etc. A group of like-minded individuals want to create a certain result for the future of a society. Conspiracies happen all the time, so that really never bothered me much about LaRouche.
But anyway, I'd just suggest you keep doing your homework on the guy and try and figure it out. Hope I've been helpful.
Possibly unfree Image:S'mores.jpg
[edit]
Image:The Decemberists.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:The Decemberists.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 02:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 22:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:Films Newsletter
[edit]The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Matthew. I'm taking a look into this case. I'll have a peek at the Socrates article and the talk page. Is there anything you think I should focus on? You can chat to me on my talk page, or by email. Regards. SilkTork 13:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I've just had a look. Appears everything is sorted. Would it be appropriate to close the case - or do you still have outstanding concerns? Regards. 13:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)SilkTork
WikiProject Films February Newsletter
[edit]The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
March WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 23:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you take a look at the article Ananthabhadram put out for a peer review? Aditya Kabir 17:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 20:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 20:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
[edit]The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call
[edit]
An automatic notification by BrownBot 22:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
September 2007
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Pythagoras, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 18:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Apology
[edit]Is there anyway to fix up the discussion page at Pythagoras so that all discussions fit under the signpost? Also, you deleted my contribution to the talk page.across the synapse 18:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fit under the signpost? I don't have the slightest clue as to what you mean.
- Sorry, I reverted all your edits -- I'll revert it back to the way it was before you removed stuff.
- I also undid your edits to the page itself, as you added some really odd stuff to the page, like an odd link in the middle of a word, just so you know. Gscshoyru 18:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
[edit]The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Etching 02.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Etching 02.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. →AzaToth 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B000065T2G.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:B000065T2G.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jacole5.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jacole5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shangalla Women.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Shangalla Women.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lock up.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lock up.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Questionnaire
[edit]As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Hartford Meetup: We need your help!
[edit]The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!
[edit]The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Across.The.Synapse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 187 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Donald Barrios - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
[edit] |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard
[edit]| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
[edit]You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
[edit]| NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5 | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March
[edit]| Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk) |
You're invited!
[edit]| NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Edit-a-thon invite
[edit]
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons
[edit]| Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England | |
|---|---|
 As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:
We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events!
[edit]| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events!
[edit]| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
August 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Torrijos–Carter Treaties may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [http://www.czimages.com/CZMemories/Articles/sellout/sellout.htm The Panama Canal Sellout</ref> In
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
[edit]You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Photo requests
[edit]Hi! Do you do photo requests (take pictures so they can be used on Wikipedia) in Greenwich, CT or Milford, CT?
Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 06:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
[edit]| Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)