User talk:Aciast1/sandbox
Instructor feedback
[edit]I think you're basically on the right track but you need to provide more detail concerning the geology. I might suggest a little bit more background information about the regional setting. If you have specific details about some of the reservoir or source rocks that would be good. I would even suggest making sub headings where you describe the reservoir formation in more detail. Presently everything is too general. what can you tell us about the maturation history or the heat flow for example? Are there any detailed studies of the sedimentary facies? Pclift (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Student Wikipedia Review
[edit]I think for the most part, you have a good description of the oilfield. I like the details you provided about the geology and lithology, but I believe you could add more specifics in this region, maybe a stratigraphy graph and more explanation on the relevant lithology series. I would try to add some sub-headings in the production and development section that includes more detail of the type of oil being produced. Check grammar and think about adding some more figures (possible a seismic interpretation from 1993-1997). There is also some repetition between the general information and production and development. -Dciaccio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dciaccio (talk • contribs) 01:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)