User talk:Acevaliant

Hackney Thugs

Hi. Can you show how the Hackney Thugs article passes our notability criteria? At present, the article does not assert notability and so could be deleted at any time under our speedy deletion criteria. Generally, showing notability involves providing reliable, third-party references in order to verify the information. Cheers, Fribbulus Xax (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dani's House, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dani's House was changed by Acevaliant (u) (t) deleting 10759 characters on 2009-12-18T21:04:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James Gandhi. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Gandhi was changed by Acevaliant (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-12-18T21:11:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to James Gandhi, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: James Gandhi was changed by Acevaliant (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-12-19T21:58:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to James Gandhi. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 22:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keith SEmple (musician)

A tag has been placed on Keith SEmple (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hackney Thugs

The article Hackney Thugs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While there's an extremely weak claim of importance here, a gsearch doesn't turn up notability or existence. Just 7 non-wiki ghits, none of which refer to a specific gang, and 0 gnews hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Very Fucked Region, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Very Fucked Region was changed by Acevaliant (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-01-08T23:44:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Javier Mascherano, you will be blocked from editing. King of the North East 00:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]