User talk:Acer723

December 2011

Hello Acer, please stop changing "WWE" to "World Wrestling Entertainment". World Wrestling Entertainment have officially re-branded themselves as simply "WWE", so according to WP:PW consensus, they are referred to as "WWE". InFlamester20 (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Acer723. You have new messages at InFlamester29's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No the company's legal name is World Wrestling Entertainment check there website,DVD's they only simplified their name to WWE.

Here's a link to their Corporate website, detailing the move to "WWE". http://corporate.wwe.com/company/initiatives/index.jsp Again, this is already a consensus among the members of Wikiproject Professional Wrestling (WP:PW) Edit: BTW, I have checked their website and they no longer make any mention of World Wrestling Entertainment. Could you show me where on their site where it says this? InFlamester20 (talk) 06:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta ask why you are being difficult with this. Just because a wrestler still says it doesn't mean anything. The announcers still mess up and say "WWF" from time to time. Does that mean they're still WWF, World Wrestling Federation? No. We (WP:PW) go by what the company says, as referenced by the link I sent. CM Punk and JR can say what they want, we go by what the owner Vince McMahon says. InFlamester20 (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at King of the Ring, you may be blocked from editing. BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 01:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Antonio Inoki WWE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Antonio Inoki WWE.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
I'll note here that your fair-use rationale is also wrong - Inoki is not dead. NiciVampireHeart 13:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one is accusing you of trying to steal. You did the right thing by uploading it under a fair-use rationale and so on. The problem is that the image does not meet Wikipedia's fair-use requirements, specifically having "No free equivalent". Inoki is incredibly famous, not only in Japan but around the world. As he's still alive, it is entirely plausible that a free-use image will be found. NiciVampireHeart 13:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rick James Grave.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rick James Grave.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rick James Grave.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rick James Grave.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mosmof (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Road Warriors.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Road Warriors.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Demolition12.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Demolition12.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Road Warriors WWE tag team champions.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Road Warriors WWE tag team champions.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About uploading images

Please make sure to clearly identify the source of your images. A source isn't where you found it, but who took the photograph and/or who owns the rights (whether it's a federation or a media organization or a private person). --Mosmof (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]