User talk:Ace of Spades/Archives/2010/April

Phreaking

You "nit-picked" on the point that a large percentage of phone phreaks were blind. I reverted the edit. The article itself explains why there is not statistical data to back this up, so why the need to tag the article to emphasize the point.

As a former a former phreak from that era, I can corroborate that statement. I can count over a dozen phone phreaks I have met personally. Myself, Woz, Crunch and one other were the only ones who had anything resembling normal vision. I met these people because of two blind friends. I became the eyes for many of them. Of a very small, counter cultural phenomenon, a majority certainly qualifies as a "large percentage." OK, we're not supposed to use original research. As further support of that I'll point you to this article which says pretty much the same thing. On Wikipedia we are aiming to get the truth through consensus. On this point, it is the truth.Trackinfo (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)