User talk:AceNoctali

Fair use rationale for Image:Image-Saki_Nijino.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Image-Saki_Nijino.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

As stated in your Talk page, I added the fair use rationale you requested. Just let me know if you find it suitable enough, and if not, please help me making one which will legitimate the picture. No need to redirect me on the Help pages if I have to do the rationale again, as I already used them in order to create it : direct help would be required in that case. I'll let you remove the template, once you'll find the rationale fair enough.Thanks in advance. AceNoctali 23:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing about this picture : I saw that the source I gave a year ago for this picture is now broken. As I feared you would complain about it too, I posted proofs of the former source (cache versions of the page given by the WayBack Machine), and two new sources, on the picture's page. Hey, better be safe than sorry. I hope you'll find the picture completely legitimate now. If not, please help me doing the rights things in order to legitimate it. Thanks in advance ! AceNoctali 01:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]