User talk:Abu muttalib

This is Abu muttalib's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepali Sahay (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepali Sahay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed published sources. Aren't they enough?

https://www.bhaskar.com/women/this-is-me/news/deepali-sahay-singing-journey-started-with-ae-malik-tere-bande-hum-acting-in-dahan-130468213.html

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/indian-idol-3-singer-deepali-sahay-ties-the-knot-with-sa-re-ga-ma-pa-fame-aishwarya-nigam-see-pics/articleshow/72042018.cms

Wikipoedia Links

Social site links (X, YouTube, FaceBook, Instagram) Abu muttalib (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abu muttalib! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. See you at TeaHouse, but when! Abu muttalib (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello Abu muttalib. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abu muttalib. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abu muttalib|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hummm... It is definitely not; except that I am a big fan of her Bhojpuri Songs, and I myself belong to Bihar. Check it out, https://www.LinkedIn.com/in/abummuttalib

And had there been any payments it would had been far far less than even peanuts for me; I am a fairly capable & seasoned ICT professional and can get my end meets very well with my work for sure and I definitely do not need such kind of paid works to earn my living. Abu muttalib (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But yes, I will review the guidelines first now before posting any articles. Abu muttalib (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay- then you can't claim that the image you posted is your own work and that you hold the copyright to it(unless you do). It's already up for deletion from Commons, but you could go and request it be deleted. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not mine, except that I have cropped it from her original video. Not sure, should I attribute to her?

As you can see, both of Deepali & Aishwarya are guest of houners on Bihar Divas and had performed at the biggest open air space in whole of Patna.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/bihar-day-2023-date-theme-history-and-significance-of-bihar-diwas/articleshow/98870173.cms Abu muttalib (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't attribute it to her unless she is the copyright holder and has made her video available for anyone to use for any purpose(including commerical) with attribution. She probably doesn't want others selling her image, so it is unlikely that she would release the copyright in such a way. Most images found on the internet are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. They must explicitly be released under a license compatible with Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to image removed.

It was mentioned, in the comment leading to rejection of article on the ground that there is already a page for Deepali Kishore, but that page does not list any source for any person with that name.

I will edit a phrases that looks promoting the subject of article. Abu muttalib (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are not relevant to the draft approval process, which only considers the text and sources. Images can wait until the draft is accepted and placed in the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Humm... OK. Abu muttalib (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepali Sahay (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepali Sahay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepali Sahay (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources in this draft do not meet the requirements explained above. That means that the current sources should not be used.

Taking part in a reality show does not automatically make a person notable.

In addition, the draft is written in an informal and promotional tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepali Sahay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 22:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepali Sahay (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coming in 7th place in a reality television programme is insufficient grounds for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepali Sahay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Will remove it. Abu muttalib (talk) 08:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Abu muttalib (talk) 09:10, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepali Sahay (December 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Exists at Deepali Kishore, and the draft creator has been asked not to resubmit this, since we can't have two articles about the same individual. Presumably, that message hasn't reached the draft creator, so by rejecting this I'll make it easier for the editor as well as for the reviewers.

bonadea contributions talk 15:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the draft is still not appropriate for Wikipedia, and that would be true if there wasn't an existing article. It still has no reliable independent sources, and it is written in a promotional and informal tone which doesn't work in an encyclopedia. --bonadea contributions talk 16:02, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Abu muttalib (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]