User talk:Abu Sayeed Hossan

Welcome!

Hello, Abu Sayeed Hossan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Ankita Mallick. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ankita Mallick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankita Mallick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankita Mallick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Macbeejack ☎ 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ankita Mallick. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Maylingoed The said page is currently under construction. And the person is a Bangladeshi freedom fighter. Now delete the deleted tag. Abu Sayeed Hossan (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not address those reasons in your Edit Summary when removing the deletion tag. Furthermore, the reasons you have stated do not conflict with the reasons for deletion on the page in question. If you want to contest this deletion, the best place to do so would be on the article's talk page or Vinegarymass911's talk page, (The person who proposed the deletion). ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Maylingoed Thank you hope you will help to edit new article. Abu Sayeed Hossan (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist)

The article Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable individual, sources do not focus on the person. No claims of significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanha Tasnia (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tanha Tasnia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abu Sayeed Hossan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Md Sunnat Ali Mollik per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Md Sunnat Ali Mollik. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 20:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]