User talk:Ablasaur

November 2020

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Johan Staël von Holstein, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 20:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ablasaur! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I need help regarding possible vandalism!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello Ablasaur. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ablasaur. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ablasaur|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 12:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status, but it's not enough. As per WP:PAID you are required to provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. GSS ^💬 18:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I actually used Whisper for it! It's an app. There are no accounts. Thanks!. Ablasaur (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? because I have evidence off-wiki that confirm that you were hired through Upwork. GSS ^💬 19:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Yes! I don't use Upwork. Ablasaur (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WOO! Tungsten (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WOO! Tungsten and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WOO! Tungsten, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 13:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

MER-C 13:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ablasaur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I understand the Terms, please tell me what part of disclosure was left? I will fulfill them if they exist. Also, for future, I won't do any paid edits. If I end up doing, then I will make sure I disclose it beforehand. I really hope to get back on Wikipedia. Thank you. Ablasaur (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick a new username. You have not declared your paid status as required by WP:COI (though you did provide a partial, incomplete, disclosure on your user page). And you forgot to tell us what you'll write about instead. Yamla (talk) 14:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ablasaur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello @Yamla:, I don't under what you meant by new username. If you need to change my username, then I will keep it Ablasaurthesecond. I was working for John from Whisper app.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ablasaur (talk · contribs) has been paid by John on their behalf. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:WOO!_Tungsten

For future, I will edit only sports related pages. Please tell me if I am on the right page. Ablasaur (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are too many issues here for you to be unblocked at this time, please address the points described below. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't believe you have disclosed all paid edits. MER-C 20:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: Ablasaur (talk) 07:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ablasaur (talk · contribs) has been paid by William on their behalf. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Tooth_whitening

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ablasaur (talk · contribs) has been paid by John on their behalf. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:WOO!_Tungsten

These are the only paid edits. Others are my personal interest. Please feel free to research on them.

Who's John or William? These disclosures are useless. There is also evidence connecting you to the accounts listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inoknowone. Do you know these users; if so, please describe. MER-C 12:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: 00:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

Hello, what else do you want me to tell??? Also, I use a public computer, I don't know who they are. I just did what I was told to. Please tell me what to do!

You don't know who paid you? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Bushranger: Ablasaur (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

It's an anonymous app, check it out! I got paid through Crypto.

Which means you, and we, have no idea who paid you to edit or why. I can't endorse unblocking under those circumstances. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Bushranger: Ablasaur (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC),[reply]

Please help me out! There has to be something I can do! Like very restricted editing? I will obey whatever you say.