User talk:Abhi97973

September 2021

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Love Story (2021 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ab207 (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Athadu. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Ab207 (talk) 07:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Love Story (2021 film), you may be blocked from editing. Diff:[1] Ab207 (talk) 13:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Love Story (2021 film). Diff: [2] Ab207 (talk) 06:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Varudu Kaavalenu. Ab207 (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Okka Magaadu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DaxServer (talk to me) 06:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vinaya Vidheya Rama. — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case:, a new account Abhi97974 was created today after the block expired, but continued making unsourced edits on the same article (Okka Magaadu) [3] that include some pretty aggressive claims. I think they just tried to avoid scrutiny, but something isn't right here. Ravensfire (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhi97973. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]