User talk:Abel

July 2023

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Ymblanter (talk) 16:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted all of your edits since all of them were bad. Additionally, new users may not edit articles related to Russia-Ukraine issues. Ymblanter (talk) 16:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "bad"? Are the official names of cities "bad"? Abel (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming the names of Ukrainian cities is bad. Do you have the right to this? Abel (talk) 16:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I am not a new user Abel (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Abel and POV pushing, please respond there if you have any arguments. Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account was started editing three days ago. What was your previous account? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ukrainian cities have their official names. For example, the city of Avdiivka. However, for reasons unknown to me, Ymblanter claims that the Ukrainian city is called Avdiivka or Avdeevka. It is not a matter of language, because the city is on the territory of Ukraine and under the control of Ukraine. Ymblanter makes up names and misleads people and I got blocked. Why didn't you ask on what basis he uses the names he made up? The name Avdeevka is valid in Russian, but it is indicated in the description м (Ukrainian: Авдіївка, IPA: [ɐu̯ˈd(j)ijiu̯kɐ]; Russian: Авдеевка, romanized: Avdeyevka, IPA: [ɐvˈdʲe(j)ɪfkə]). But the official name of the city cannot be changed because it is a fraud.

Decline reason:

You have to address the reasons of the block, which are making disruptive edits. It doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong, disruptive editing will not be tolerated here. Please read up on disruptive editing. Your unblock request is being declined for now. Please re-apply once you are ready to address the reasons. Lourdes 11:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Abel (talk) 10:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75922

is closed. Declined carried over below.

"I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}."

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DFO, you should block this user from UTRS so that we don't get subjected to abusive language of such horrific nature again. El_C 00:21, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Not verified so could have been an impostor. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh, you lost me. El_C 02:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: A certain LTA fakes the user ID's at UTRS and gets us to ban people and then mocks me on my talk. This ticket was not verified as to the authenticity of the filer. No way to know who filed it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El C:I'd like to ask you to reverse your indef with TPA revoked. The person at UTRS might have been pretending to be this user. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #76268 leads credence to the impostor theory. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for egregious misconduct at WP:UTRS. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. El_C 23:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]