User talk:Abdurrahman Muslim

Hello, welcome to my talk page! All God-fearing people are welcome here, islamophobes not so much.

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Najaf with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will pray for you in the local Mosque, you poor mistaken soul! --Abdurrahman Muslim (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abdurrahman Muslim, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abdurrahman Muslim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Roscelese that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sjö. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Transition to the New Order seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This edit: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Transition_to_the_New_Order&diff=624711257&oldid=624711154 was not very neutral Sjö (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User worth a look. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are in the wrong place

Wikipedia is not a venue to right great wrongs. Nor do we support any religious point of view. Or even non-religion point of view. As for your talk page post on Brighton and Hove, singling out women in that way -- I don't think Muhammad was as anti-women as you seem to be. Anyway, my point is that this doesn't seem to be a place for you, and if you continue in this way you will be blocked indefinitely. See also Wikipedia:Advocacy Dougweller (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seeing wot I'm seein'? ″I don't think Muhammad was as anti-women as you seem to be.″ Are you implying Muhammad was anti-women? This is outrageous, you islamophobe bigot. Hope the UAF boys will teach you a lesson, you Muhammad-hater!Abdurrahman Muslim (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdurrahman Muslim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am asking for a conditional unblock. I admit, that I have misbehaved, adding my personal observation at various talk pages and not always adhered to strict NPOV. However, all my edits were made in good faith. I am disappointed at the suggestions by the blocking admin that I was somehow not serious in my editing or even 'made fun' of Islam or other editors. This is simply not true! All my editing was meant seriously, the thing is, though, that average Anglo-British and British Asian views are quite different on some matters. Nevertheless, I promise to word my edits more neutrally from now on. I'd like to fill in lacunae related to Islam in Europe. The first article I promise to start is about Taj Hargey, it's surprising there is no article yet. It's an important figure of the liberal trend of Islam.Abdurrahman Muslim (talk) 18:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.