User talk:Abdulhy

August 2022

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hazaras, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Ibrahim Khan (leader) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Muhammad Ibrahim Khan (leader), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saraik District of Afghanistan

Saraik district [1] Saraik (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks Abdulhy (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem to be the case [2] [3] [4]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why should sourced information be removed? Abdulhy (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because Qasemyar writes something that is not in Bacon's article. So Qasemyar's article dosn't meet the requirements described in WP:RS.--KoizumiBS (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the source is reliable and does not have any flaws. This is just your claim to remove sourced information that I have included. Abdulhy (talk) 11:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred Hello, I have added sourced and reliable information in the article. Unfortunately, HistoryofIran reverted my edit without explanation or discussion. I did not start the editorial war, but they did. Here, I am right because I was preventing the removal of source materials. And I didn't delete any informations and contents. Thanks Abdulhy (talk) 13:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: I request and beg you to restore the editing and source information provided by the professor and historian Bacon. After that, I promise that there will never edit warring from me again. Thanks Abdulhy (talk) 14:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The block has nothing to do with whether the information was sourced and everything to do with you repeatedly reverting to force the information into the article. You need to discuss the addition and wait for consensus to support the addition. If other editors don't support your additions/changes, they don't go in. —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hazaras, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My brother, I don't know why you have taken a strong position with me, that is, you quickly delete any source and information that I add to the article. Abdulhy (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Iampharzad per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iampharzad. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 21:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy, You blocked me wrongly. I don't have any Sockpuppets. Abdulhy (talk) 03:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I find it unlikely all the behavioural overlap occurred by accident. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 08:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]