User talk:Abbj1991

Hello, Abbj1991! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Texas Flood Tour has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc71ffdcsbk, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdmwu0mryxu). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring Wikipedia policies

You edits to the Stevie Ray Vaughan article have been reverted several time because you are ignoring many key project policies including WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:AWW, WP:V and WP:RS. Please to not reduce the quality of Wikipedia articles by removing referenced neutral text and replacing it with praising fancruft content. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia not a SRV fansite. Propose you changes on the article talk page and wait for approval before attempting to edit anymore. 81.138.133.84 (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Stevie Ray Vaughan appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. <3 bunny 22:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Stevie Ray Vaughan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stevie Ray Vaughan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 23:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Stevie Ray Vaughan. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check your definition of vandalism? While this user doesn't seem interested in responding, at the same time I am puzzled by the treatment of this new editor. Outriggr (talk) 03:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, the user has inquired here.[1]

Abbj1991, I'll try this one more time. My advice is to make smaller changes at a time to the SRV article. Are you including references in your edits? It's clear to me that what you're writing is based on some knowledge, but it is best to include references (SRV biography, etc.). If you have any questions, speak up. Otherwise you're going to get a result ("block") that you don't deserve from the above "experts". Outriggr (talk) 03:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Real Libs-speak politely 00:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]