User talk:Abbasfirnas887

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Abbasfirnas887! Thank you for your contributions. I am Darkness Shines and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Darkness Shines (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shankhairpara massacre

I had never heard of this before, and a search shows it does not in fact exist? It is not even in the book you cited, have you made an error? Darkness Shines (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, two of the letters were transposed - it's supposed to be 'Shankharipara' - it's in Dhaka. Thanks for pointing that out. Abbasfirnas887 (talk) 21:59, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blog references

Read WP:BLP no blogs are allowed in a blp Darkness Shines (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Abbasfirnas887. You have new messages at Darkness Shines's talk page.
Message added 19:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Darkness Shines (talk) 19:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Darkness Shines (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You have broken the 1RR restriction on the International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) article and readded your BLP vio, self revert or I will have to report you. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is not BLP vio - see the talk page Abbasfirnas887 (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee Notice

Dear Abbasfirnas887, I wanted you to know that I also got a notice from User:Darkness Shines on my talk page that looks like yours (in history). You should know that DS placed that banner incorrectly and it makes him look like an administrator. He is not an administrator. Moreover, it looks as though he is from of Arbitration Committee. Again he is not nor has he ever been a member of Arbitration Committee. Like me, you may have been doing something innocent, but the banner states unfairly, "If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic." This is boilerplate language given to anyone who gets this template. It does not mean in any way that you did something wrong. Furthermore, although there is very little information about this banner, you may remove it from your page. Your name was also listed by DS on a noticeboard. In my case, I believe this is wrong because I'm not interested in editing in this area. You are not being investigated in any way. As a protest I have written a strikethrough mark through my name at the following location. [1] If you are not happy about your treatment by DS or being listed on this noticeboard, then I would encourage you to do the same. I hope I have clarified your situation as I had to find out more about mine and wanted to share the results with you. I wish you good editing in Wikipedia, Crtew (talk) 09:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Several of us have removed ourselves from the list as DS undid my strikethrough. It is within your right to remove your name from that list. Crtew (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those of us who challenged DS today and deleted our names were taken off the list this evening. Don't try to take your name off the list. If you want it removed, all you have to do is to request this from User:RegentsPark. Our names were taken off because DS did not use the template correctly and editors believed he was using it punitively against people to quash their edits. Crtew (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]