User talk:Abbas dhothar

Hello Abbas

Fine struggle and information which we already have not.Thank you so much God bless u. Tariq Javeed Dhothar Advocate Dist, President youthwing PMLN Hafizabad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.187.105.220 (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jat people, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — 'Jeff G. ツ (talk),' 03:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhothar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhothar

Hi, I've had to revert you again here at Dhothar. You have reinstated content that clearly fails to meet the requirements of Wikipedia. For example:#,

It is almost entirely unsourced
The three sources that are present are unreliable
The list of notable people seems to comprise people who are not in fact notable, lacks links to articles about them and looks likely almost entirely to fall foul of User:Sitush/Common#Castelists and WP:NLIST.

Your attempts to improve Wikipedia are appreciated but you do have to abide by our policies. In addition, bearing in mind your user name, it might be worth you reading about our attitude regarding conflicts of interest. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhothar

The article Dhothar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable article, possibly directory, several of these article are just stub unsourced, an article (list) containing all these entries would suit better. All these articles were kept under the moniker that they would be eventually expanded, which clearly they did not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhothar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhothar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aulakh

added links pointing to Ola, Kala, Aula and Kalkal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhothar

The article Dhothar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. All the clan articles in the category of 'Jat Clans of Punjab' face the same issue. Most of them are as if there are listed in a clans directory, WP:NOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 12:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your addition to Rai Ahmad Khan Kharal has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hitro talk 06:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Shah Aqeeq Baba article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Proposed deletion of Rai Ahmad Khan Kharal

Hello, Abbas dhothar. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rai Ahmad Khan Kharal, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Abbas dhothar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23185 was submitted on Nov 08, 2018 15:43:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

I am blocked on en wiki , plz unblock me.--Abbas dhothar (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Abbas dhothar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24683 was submitted on Apr 11, 2019 19:33:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abbas dhothar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am admin & Interface Administrator on pnbwiki, some time I need assistance , as I am blocked on enwiki, so I can't leave massage on user talk page e.g (User:NahidSultan) and also want write some articles on Heros and history of punjab. I am blocked by User:Yamla. plz unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. I am Sevindik Nasiboglu. Thank you for translating my "Heart Mountain" article into Punjabi. Help me to spread this wonderful series on Wikipedia around the world. Sevindiknesiboglu2008 04:44, 31 October 2020

Nomination of Chak Dhothar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chak Dhothar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak Dhothar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aydoh8 (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Join WikiProject: Archiving Wikipedia Articles

Your article was recently nominated for deletion, i am working on archiving any articles proposed for deletion so that work will not be lossed and for access after deletion. if you would like to join the project here is the project portal: WikiProject: Archiving AFD/Soon To Be Deleted Articles PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]