User talk:Aaronwinborn

Welcome

Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers.

Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this ~~~, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~~~~. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. Father Howabout1 ^{Talk to me!} 16:07, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Institute for Historical Review

If you will look at the article on the Institute for Historical Review, you will find that the Institute is well-known for their Holocaust denial and connection to Neo-Nazi organizations. Even the article that you corrected the link for admits "In many ways, the Institute for Historical Review and the Simon Wiesenthal Center are antipodal adversaries." Such non-mainstream views in an external link should have some information about such a site. BlankVerse ∅ 18:19, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

The Wikipedia has a number of unwritten traditions (that sooner or later I will have to add someplace, when I figure out where the most appropriate place to put the info). One is that welcome messages usually go on a new editor's talk page (a tradition that isn't even mentioned on the Wikipedia:Welcoming Committee page!). Another is that new additions to talk pages almost always go at the bottom. BlankVerse ∅ 15:14, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Humanities, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude!

This is obvious vandalism. Do not fix typos in it; revert it. Raul654 17:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latin America won!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Latin America was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Joyous | Talk 18:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kingoodie hammer

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Kingoodie hammer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kingoodie artefact for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingoodie artefact is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingoodie artefact until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 18:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]